Le mardi 04 décembre 2012 à 00:37 +0100, Stefano Karapetsas a écrit :
> > - libwnck, still in Debian
> We forked libwnck for three main reasons: to have stable API, to keep
> GTK2 support, and to add new features on it (we already started to do this).
The GTK2 libwnck version will not change API
Hi Joss,
thank you for your feedback.
Il 04/12/2012 00:05, Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
This still includes seemingly useless forks of:
- libwnck, still in Debian
We forked libwnck for three main reasons: to have stable API, to keep
GTK2 support, and to add new features on it (we already starte
Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 20:28 +0100, Stefano Karapetsas a écrit :
> That repository contains the current stable MATE. The repository with
> develpment MATE packages, without "obsolete" libraries, is
> deb http://dev.mate-desktop.org/debian wheezy main
> Our github repo with debian folders, in
Il 03/12/2012 22:33, Joachim Wiedorn ha scritto:
And in the same way: why mdm instead of gdm ?
MDM is not part of MATE Desktop.
Cheers,
Stefano
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
Jeremy Bicha wrote on 2012-12-03 15:39:
> What's so bad about evince that you need to use a forked version
> anyway? Or gnome-icon-theme, gnome-keyring, gnome-terminal, etc.
And in the same way: why mdm instead of gdm ?
I have created some updates of gdm with the same patches as mdm, but
without
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 02:06:03AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> You can use the upstream packaging, available at:
> deb http://packages.mate-desktop.org/repo/debian wheezy main
Thanks but I'm interested in possibly helping an effort to package MATE
in Debian, rather than run it myself.
> So fro
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:39:03PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> What's so bad about evince that you need to use a forked version
> anyway? Or gnome-icon-theme, gnome-keyring, gnome-terminal, etc.
This is drifting off the topic at hand, please, take it to another
list if you want to continue down t
On 3 December 2012 14:28, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
> As I already said you many times, MATE no longer uses these "obsolete" and
> "duplicated" libraries.
>
> And, maybe you dont know, but we are already working with GNOME developers
> to share efforts with them. Just some examples: with yelp deve
Il 03/12/2012 19:46, Josselin Mouette ha scritto:
Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 02:06 +0100, Adam Borowski a écrit :
You can use the upstream packaging, available at:
deb http://packages.mate-desktop.org/repo/debian wheezy main
I see this still includes all s/gnome/mate/ libraries from GNOME 2,
Le lundi 03 décembre 2012 à 02:06 +0100, Adam Borowski a écrit :
> You can use the upstream packaging, available at:
> deb http://packages.mate-desktop.org/repo/debian wheezy main
I see this still includes all s/gnome/mate/ libraries from GNOME 2,
while their counterparts are still here in Debian
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 10:21:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:26:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me
> > > t
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 10:21:43PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:26:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > > I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to h
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 01:26:50PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me
> > to get MATE into Debian for Jessie.
>
> I'd like to ping ba
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me
> to get MATE into Debian for Jessie.
I'd like to ping back and see if there's anyone here who'd be
interested in joining me to package MATE for D
Also as you aren't the filer or owner of that ITP please make sure anything
you do is agreeable to the actual ITP owner.
I'm the current ITP owner, and an upstream MATE developer too. I alread talked
with Adrian some weeks ago and I would be happy to move MATE packaging on an
appropriate team.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:22:52AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I'd therefore like to ask if anyone here would be willing to help me
> to get MATE into Debian for Jessie.
As you know, there is already an effort to package MATE ongoing (at least
#658783). The purpose of ITPs is to pre
16 matches
Mail list logo
