On Tue, 05 Apr 2016, Simon McVittie wrote:
> This sounds quite a lot like the "rolling" suite that gets proposed
> every few years, with the possible exception that some proposals
> for "rolling" have had it bypass unstable while unstable is frozen,
> and it sounds as though this doesn't.
>
> I th
On Tue, 05 Apr 2016 at 12:18:18 +0200, Enrico Zini wrote:
> ...and to have a suite, like testing, that:
>
> - does not transition to stable, and is intended to be used as is
> - contains anything that enter testing
> - also contains the packages that would enter testing but do not
>because
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:46:36AM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> I think the success of our stable releases depends on the continued
> assessments of each and every maintainer. I don't believe you will find
> enough developers and maintainers who are willing to evaluate all
> packages in the arc
Hello,
I think the success of our stable releases depends on the continued
assessments of each and every maintainer. I don't believe you will find
enough developers and maintainers who are willing to evaluate all
packages in the archive. Who will make the decision if a package is ok
for stable or
4 matches
Mail list logo
