Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-18 Thread Bart Schuller
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get > outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package > just because we're making a new release. The "making a release" may not be the best reason. Bu

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-17 Thread Carlos Laviola
David Starner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > > If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get > > outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package > > just because we're making a new release. > >

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-17 Thread Peter Makholm
David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And what makes you think there has been no new upstream versions for all > those packages? Nothing. I commented on you general opinion. -- Emacs er det eneste moderne styresystem der ikke er multitrådet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-17 Thread David Starner
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:39:12PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote: > If a package works, has no new upstream versions and doesn't get > outdated policywise there is no need for a new version of the package > just because we're making a new release. And what makes you think there has been no new upstre

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-17 Thread Peter Makholm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: > IMO each package should at least once per release upload a status > report. Also there was ample time for the transition of each package to Disagreed. We should make package uploads just to make uploads. If a package works, has no new upstream versions and

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-11 Thread Josip Rodin
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 03:57:26PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: > These packages have not needed any updates. [...] > Is it really necessary to make a new upload, rather > than copying or linking these packages to the pool? > > I will make a new upload before the woody release if it is >

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-11 Thread Paul Slootman
On Wed 10 Apr 2002, Bob Hilliard wrote: > Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock > > > The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory, > > possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full > > Woody develo

Re: Packages still in Potato

2002-04-10 Thread Bob Hilliard
Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Packages: dict-easton, dict-gazetteer, dict-hitchcock > The listed packages are still located in the Potato directory, > possibly because there wasn't any update necessary during the full > Woody development phase, but maybe also because there is no intere