Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-14 Thread Richard Winters
Hello Kamaraju, Thank you for that information I am checking it out at this time! Best, *Richard B. Winters* On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:51 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi < raju.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Richard Winters wrote: > > > > I'm not a 'debian' mai

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-14 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Richard Winters wrote: > > I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth -> but > I'm a c++ developer with over 10 years experience. I'm experienced with > linux and more specifically debian development (just not officially). > > That said I

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-12 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Ian Jackson wrote: > Jay Berkenbilt writes ("packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils"): >> The other two packages are relatively low-effort packages to maintain. >> The psutils package is dead upstream though there is someone out there >> who might be interested in taking over upstrea

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Jay Berkenbilt writes ("packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils"): > The other two packages are relatively low-effort packages to maintain. > The psutils package is dead upstream though there is someone out there > who might be interested in taking over upstream. I would introduce him >

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Richard Winters
Jay, Thank you for that good sir, I will do just that (I'm sure by the time I wrap my head around orchestrating a transition of ICU to version 54.1; someone would have taken over - and perhaps I'd be able to contribute through them at that time and work my way up to a co/maintainer over time). Re

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Richard Winters wrote: > Hey there: > > Posting again because I didn't hit reply-all (sorry, but would rather > advertise I"m available for help to the whole mailing list.) > > I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth -> > but I'm a c++ developer with over 10 years expe

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Richard Winters
Hey there: Posting again because I didn't hit reply-all (sorry, but would rather advertise I"m available for help to the whole mailing list.) I'm not a 'debian' maintainer or developer...total newbie to alioth -> but I'm a c++ developer with over 10 years experience. I'm experienced with linux a

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Jay Berkenbilt
Ondřej Surý wrote: > JFTR I sent email to tiff RFA and I am willing to take over it. > > Thank you, Jay, for all your hardwork on libtiff4->libtiff5 transition > (and also for the rest of your packages). > > If you don't get any volunteers for the rest, please ping here and me > again after jessi

Re: packages for adoption: icu, tiff, xerces-c, psutils

2015-02-11 Thread Ondřej Surý
JFTR I sent email to tiff RFA and I am willing to take over it. Thank you, Jay, for all your hardwork on libtiff4->libtiff5 transition (and also for the rest of your packages). If you don't get any volunteers for the rest, please ping here and me again after jessie release (instead of orphaning t

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Indra Kusuma
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: # Hola amigos, # # # Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages # properly. So here are packages up for adoption : # # coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, # libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Aurélien Beaujean
Le mardi 27 août 2002 à 22:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan écrivait: > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sharefont. As Rene took muttprint, i took latex2html and i will also upl

RE: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread STOJICEVIC Edi EXPSIA
> Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttprint, type1inst, freefont, and sha

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi all, Chanop Silpa-Anan wrote: > Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-dev, libjpeg-mmx-dev, libjpeg-mmx-progs, > muttp

Re: Packages for adoption

2002-08-27 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Il mar, 2002-08-27 alle 14:50, Chanop Silpa-Anan ha scritto: > Hola amigos, > > > Due to my constraints in life, I could not maintain a number of packages > properly. So here are packages up for adoption : > > coriander, cpuburn, gscanbus, gsumi, hyperlatex, latex2html, > libdc1394-8, libdc1394-

Re: Packages for adoption

1999-09-16 Thread Taketoshi Sano
Hi. I am now using and prefer the asclassic, and since knghtbrd (the maintainer) and joel (he is another applicant for asclassic) agreed to my succession, I take it over. Thanks. In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph Carter) writes: > [1 ] > I have a few packages which are