Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > > Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
> > > > of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
> > > > a language which onl
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:27, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:42AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > Or else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff
> > > file.
> >
> > Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
> > of modification
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
> > > of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
> > > a language which only had a non-free compiler, then uploaded source
>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:27:09PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
> > of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
> > a language which only had a non-free compiler, then uploaded source
> > packages
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:42AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Or else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff
> > file.
>
> Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
> of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
>
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:09, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Or else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff
> file.
Hm, I don't think I like this. The gif images aren't the preferred form
of modification. Would we accept it if someone had a program written in
a language which only h
Chris Leishman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or
> > else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff
> > file. Adapt your rules in a way, that
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:09:54AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Look, if doxygen can be configured for your packages not using dot. Or
> else include a "precompiled" version of the docs into your diff
> file. Adapt your rules in a way, that it can fall back to the
> precompiled version, if the
Chris Leishman writes:
> Hi all,
>
> The recently released version of libxml++ (0.16.0) includes doxygen
> documentation produced from the code (to html), so I created a -doc
> package for this. However, doxygen wanted to use "dot" to create some
> of the images for the documentation. Problem wi
9 matches
Mail list logo
