Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.12.2012, 23:18 +0100 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> > With my scheme, he could install i-want-all-prof-packages and the
> > package manager will automatically install the missing -prof packages.
>
> Actually, that's not guaranteed, since your proposed
> i-want-all-prof-packages
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 10:31:19PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 23.12.2012, 22:15 +0100 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> > No, that's not true; a Recommends is not a Suggests.
>
> That’s not what I said. But it is a suggestion in the sense that
> installing a package without
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 23.12.2012, 22:15 +0100 schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> No, that's not true; a Recommends is not a Suggests.
That’s not what I said. But it is a suggestion in the sense that
installing a package without the package that is Recommends is valid.
> It seems perfectly suited for your
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 02:57:56PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 22.12.2012, 14:39 +0200 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> > On Sb, 22 dec 12, 13:17:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Users tend to fall into one of three classes:
> > > A. Users that, if they have foo-dev ins
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.12.2012, 12:51 -0600 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> According to the package description, you only need the -dev package if
> you actually plan to configure the window manager instead of using its
> defaults. Which presumably most people do, so I guess the Recommends
> makes se
[Joachim Breitner]
> > And a foo-dev Recommends: foo-prof is not suitable because?
>
> because we cannot tell what the user will want. For example, a user of
> xmonad will not want -prof packages installed, and an addition 400MB of
> useless stuff on his computer is not in his, and hence our, int
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:57:56 +0100
Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 22.12.2012, 14:39 +0200 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> > On Sb, 22 dec 12, 13:17:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Users tend to fall into one of three classes:
> > > A. Users that, if they have foo-dev installed, always
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 22.12.2012, 14:39 +0200 schrieb Andrei POPESCU:
> On Sb, 22 dec 12, 13:17:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Users tend to fall into one of three classes:
> > A. Users that, if they have foo-dev installed, always also want
> > foo-prof installed.
> > B. Users tha
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012 14:24:46 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Andrei POPESCU (2012-12-22 13:39:07)
> > On Sb, 22 dec 12, 13:17:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > Users tend to fall into one of three classes:
> > > A. Users that, if they have foo-dev installed, always also want
> > >
Quoting Andrei POPESCU (2012-12-22 13:39:07)
> On Sb, 22 dec 12, 13:17:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Users tend to fall into one of three classes:
> > A. Users that, if they have foo-dev installed, always also want
> > foo-prof installed.
> > B. Users that want to manually decid
On Sb, 22 dec 12, 13:17:32, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Users tend to fall into one of three classes:
> A. Users that, if they have foo-dev installed, always also want
> foo-prof installed.
> B. Users that want to manually decide for what packages they want
> the -prof packa
11 matches
Mail list logo
