Re: Package mailing lists

2011-11-13 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi Stefano, On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:41:27AM +0900, Iustin Pop wrote: > Sorry for reviving and old email. To what extend do you think this > should apply - even at individual package level? > > I ask this because of the following: recently I had a 1-1 discussion > with a co-maintainer of o

Re: Package mailing lists

2011-11-13 Thread Filipus Klutiero
Hi Iustin, Iustin Pop wrote: On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:48:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > - I've made the "private email aliases considered harmful" point [10], >in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions >in Debian that could happen only through pri

Re: Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)

2011-11-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 07:41:27AM +0900, Iustin Pop wrote: > Sorry for reviving and old email. To what extend do you think this > should apply - even at individual package level? > > I ask this because of the following: recently I had a 1-1 discussion > with a co-maintainer of one of my packages,

Re: Package mailing lists (was: bits from the DPL for September 2011)

2011-11-08 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Iustin Pop] > Could/should Debian make it easier for each package to have an own email > list (i.e. making it easier to have "1-person team maintenance")? We have {pkg}@packages.debian.org and {srcpkg}@packages.qa.debian.org. I don't know if mail to these aliases get archived, but at least it is