On 10/13/18 12:58 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 06:01:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> Has policy changed regarding support for multiple inits, or is it just that
>>> no one is maintaining the shim and sysvinit-core?
>>
>> The latter. systemd-shim has been orphaned for ove
El Wed, 4 de Jun 2014 a las 11:47 AM, Thomas Goirand
escribió:
On 06/04/2014 02:50 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
All I've tested so far is
inside my test vm, where it works fine. I'd love to have it on my
work
laptop, if I just had a replacement for policykit.
There's nobody currently wo
On 06/05/2014 12:17 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> The current plan was to have the interpreter (of runscripts) called
> openrc-run, separated from the rest of OpenRC, so it could be used when
> using sysv-rc too. In that way, we could start aggressively replacing
> sysv-rc scripts when Jessie is out,
On 06/04/2014 02:50 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On 06/04/2014 11:19 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> oh and ... no systemd, so it can run on non-linux ports! :)
>
> On that note, how are things with OpenRC.
Not great. I have not enough time for it. OpenStack (with the recent
Icehouse release) drai
On 2014-02-13 9:30, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hello List,
I have jsut noticed that OpenRC is in expimental:
will it be ready for Jessie ?
You might want to direct that question to the maintainers; it's not
debian-devel's decision.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...
Le jeudi, 13 février 2014, 10.30:16 Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
> I have jsut noticed that OpenRC is in expimental:
> will it be ready for Jessie ?
I don't see why not, but this would be best answered by the OpenRC
maintainers, hereby CC'ing their list. Please discuss that there.
Cheers,
OdyX
--
T
On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:30 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List,
>
> I have jsut noticed that OpenRC is in expimental:
> will it be ready for Jessie ?
Hopefully it will. It is currently in active development.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
On 02/12/2014 04:10 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Wasn't there some plan to have OpenRC look for its "runscripts" in a
> parallel directory alongside init.d as well as in init.d itself, and
> treat /etc/openrc-init.d/foo (or whatever) as a replacement for
> /etc/init.d/foo? Then you could just say "O
On 02/11/2014 09:53 PM, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> The discussions on init system have discovered much energy of
> developers and users,
> so I think they are able to use that energy to support multiple systems :-)
No, please don't. I'd rather have other DDs use this energy and
help me (and paultag) go
The discussions on init system have discovered much energy of
developers and users,
so I think they are able to use that energy to support multiple systems :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb
On 11/02/14 15:19, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Yes, that's my proposal, and as well deprecate sysv-rc in the favor of
> OpenRC, and allow OpenRC runscript files *only* if there's support for
> the default init system (because this way the default init system will
> not use them, so the runscript format
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 03:29:28AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 25, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > Whatever you have decided about Linux only, this is relevant
> > information. Debian is about versatility in the Unix/Posix way, not any
> No, it's not. Next.
Does the NEXT OS still exist? SCNR
On Jan 25, Svante Signell wrote:
> Whatever you have decided about Linux only, this is relevant
> information. Debian is about versatility in the Unix/Posix way, not any
No, it's not. Next.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 07/15/2013 01:37 PM, heroxbd wrote:
I can visualize that within two months we will have a off-the-shelf
OpenRC package working with initscripts/sysvinit vanilla offering modern
features like cgroups, at users' choice.
Good, I'll take your word on that.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Gl
Dear Guys,
Holger Levsen writes:
> one which is at least installable with apt-get + sid sources. that's
> still not the case, despite 684396 being announced here a year ago.
(Replying generally)
There seems to be some doubts concerning why #684396 has taken a whole
year without being finished.
On 07/14/2013 11:40 PM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sonntag, 14. Juli 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> yet there isn't any fully working implementation
>> I'm not sure what you call "fully working".
>
> one which is at least installable with apt-get + sid sources.
> that's still not the case
16 matches
Mail list logo
