On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 02 octobre 2011 à 02:36 -0400, Manjul Apratim a écrit :
> > And now a lot of software in Sid is no more the latest that the FOSS
> > world has to offer - to cite a few, Sid still has rhythmbox-0.12 while
> > I have been using r
Le dimanche 02 octobre 2011 à 02:36 -0400, Manjul Apratim a écrit :
> And now a lot of software in Sid is no more the latest that the FOSS
> world has to offer - to cite a few, Sid still has rhythmbox-0.12 while
> I have been using rhythmbox-2.90 in both Ubuntu and Arch without
> problems for quite
Hiya,
Manjul Apratim wrote:
> I cannot help but view too many apt pins
> as an intentional recipe for disaster!
If you really want to experience life on the edge, you can try this:
echo 'APT::Default-Release "experimental";' \
>/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/preferexperimental.conf
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Manjul Apratim wrote:
Therefore, from
purely a user's perspective, I wonder about the daunting task of maintaining
Testing/Sid/Experimental separately - with due respect, if Sid was itself
Experimental, and Testing the stabler version of that (but < Stable) which
would eventu
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:36:03AM -0400, Manjul Apratim wrote:
> My reason for harassing the venerable Debian developers on here is probably
> not new and discussed time and again given the thoroughness with which
> Debian does everything: the time that I was not following Debian has
> witnessed t
On Sun, 2 Oct 2011 02:36:03 -0400
Manjul Apratim wrote:
> cite a few, Sid still has rhythmbox-0.12 while I have been using
> rhythmbox-2.90 in both Ubuntu and Arch without problems for quite some time
OK, what that comes down to is the migration to libgtk3 from libgtk2
and gnome3 from gnome2. Th
6 matches
Mail list logo
