Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:49:07PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> > I've been meaning to bring this up for a while:
> > Why on earth was this change ever made?
>
> I can't speak for whoever made the change, but I suspect that it is
> because LD_LIBRARY_PAT
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 02:14:42PM +1100, Peter Eckersley wrote:
> That doesn't seem like an elegant explanation. Wouldn't it make more
> sense to have a script to make sure that a Debian package hasn't got
> links to whacky non-standard libraries?
>
> The current behaviour is rather non-intuitiv
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 08:23:29PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:49:07PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> > I've been meaning to bring this up for a while:
> > Why on earth was this change ever made?
>
> I can't speak for whoever made the change, but I suspect that it is
> be
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:49:07PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> I've been meaning to bring this up for a while:
> Why on earth was this change ever made?
I can't speak for whoever made the change, but I suspect that it is
because LD_LIBRARY_PATH can be used to support libraries in /usr/local/lib
fo
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > Changes in version 1.9.2:
> >
> > Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
> > for Debian (Bug#8181).
>
> oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > Changes in version 1.9.2:
> >
> > Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
> > for Debian (Bug#8181).
>
> oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before p
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:30:58PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to
> date, and all these programs stopped working because the needed library
> was not found. If I copy the /usr/local/lib contents to /lib everything
> works fine,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Changes in version 1.9.2:
>
> Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
> for Debian (Bug#8181).
oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before potato. dunno why this
would change between potato and w
Previously Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I just finished building a woody system, so I can get my packages up to
> date, and all these programs stopped working because the needed library
> was not found. If I copy the /usr/local/lib contents to /lib everything
> works fine, suggesting that ldconfig no long
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 05:30:58PM +, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> I run several "ancient" programs, by housing them in /usr/local/bin, with
> the libraries they need (which are no longer provided in Debian) situated
> in /usr/local/lib. In previous systems, right up to potato, this worked
> fine.
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
