apt-show-versions | grep /experimental
should work too, but I haven't tested it (no experimental packages
installed on this machine)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > >
> > > [Jérôme Warnier]
> > > > Or even better: a list of a
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 15:04 +0100, Michal Politowski a écrit :
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> [...]
> > BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
>
> aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
>
> > Or even better: a list of all packages already instal
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Jérôme Warnier]
> > > Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> > > which have an experimental version?
> >
> > There might
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Jérôme Warnier]
> > Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> > which have an experimental version?
>
> There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
> sources.list...
>
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
> BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
> Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> which have an experimental version?
aptitude search '~i~Aexperime
[Jérôme Warnier]
> Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
t=$(tempfile);
awk > $t '/^Package:/{print "^" $2 "$"}' \
/var/lib/apt/li
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 16:38 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> > generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> > e
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Further to
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 12:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> > generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> > experimental (currentl
[Jérôme Warnier]
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Hmmm, I thought experimental was garbage-collected automatically in
this ca
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
>
> If not, is there a way to
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> > manpages-net
>
> this package appeared only for a short time (and yes, I have it installed
> too). I think it was in Incoming only.
How about re-creating it?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:41:29AM +0200 , Michael Meskes wrote:
> After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
> them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
> lde
yes. it had RC, and it is still in mess due to some strange gcc header
interactions :(
> manpages-n
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > > eaudio
> > Um, xmms I think.
> Since xmms does not mention eaudio anywhere in its control file I though
> these two programs were completely different.
Well, the author of eaudi
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > eaudio
>
> Um, xmms I think.
Since xmms does not mention eaudio anywhere in its control file I though
these two programs were completely different.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heus
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:25:16PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> # apt-get install intlfonts-european
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Package intlfonts-european has no available version, but exists in the
> database.
> This typically means that the package was me
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 01:57:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote a free reimplementation of this,
> gnuhtml2latex, so html2latex was removed.
Got this too. Thanks.
> These both still seem to be in woody.
So maybe they had release critical bugs. I cannot check that right
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> html2latex
tetex, perhaps?
> eaudio
Um, xmms I think.
> gtkbrowser
Hmmm. No idea.
Mike.
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
>them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
>
>html2latex
Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote a free reimplementation of this,
gnuhtml2latex, so html2latex was removed.
>lde
>gtkbrows
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> intlfonts-european
# apt-get install intlfonts-european
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package intlfonts-european has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the pa
21 matches
Mail list logo
