Re: Notes on current sid and libpng

2002-08-17 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 14:51:04 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: > Indeed. Try recompiling the latest Evolution, for example. Gnumeric is another; see my messages in the "New gnome-libs package build against libpng3" thread on debian-gtk-gnome. Ray -- [...] computer source code, though unintelligib

Re: Notes on current sid and libpng

2002-08-17 Thread Colin Walters
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 12:23, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I haven't had time to experiment, but I think there should be some > occurrences of > libpng2 and libpng3 being linked at the same time, which we tried to avoid, > but > failed. Indeed. Try recompiling the latest Evolution, for example. It

Re: Notes on current sid and libpng

2002-08-17 Thread Christian Marillat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:23:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: [...] > Christian Marillat decided to recompile libgnome against > libgdk-imlib2, and libpng3, so some parts of gnome1 are recompiled > against libpng3. > And more ABI breaking here -- why are we breakin

Re: Notes on current sid and libpng

2002-08-17 Thread rmurray
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:23:41AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > libgdk-imlib2 was introduced, to allow png3-linked gdk-imlib, so > that gtk2.0 applications can link with gdk-imlib. gtk2.0 applications should be using the gdk-pixbuf included with gtk2.0, which is already linked against png3. gdk