On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 14:17:50 -0600, John Goerzen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Besides, NNTP is better-suited for it, and BTW is already available at
>www.gmane.org.
If we start referring people to GMANE, we should drop them a load of
older list archives for import. They only started in mid-2002.
G
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:12:57AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists? It
> > recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or do I
> > have a flaw in t
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 06:20:18PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists?
> > It recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or
> > do I have a flaw in that idea?
>
> I think IMAP on large mailboxes could be quite res
Ulrich Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 12 December 2003 01:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> If you're looking for an up-to-the-minute archive of Debian
>> lists, check out the nntp server at gmane.org. Visit
>> www.gmane.org for details.
> I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) acc
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists? It
> recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or do I
> have a flaw in that idea?
No real reason for this. Just grab the compressed mbox once
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 12 December 2003 01:14, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> If you're looking for an up-to-the-minute archive of Debian
> lists, check out the nntp server at gmane.org. Visit
> www.gmane.org for details.
I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 06:37:57PM -0500, Phil Edwards wrote:
> It isn't just debian-boot; none of the lists I checked at random have
> been updated past that date and time. No responses have been logged in
> the audit trail either, which for an 'important' severity is disturbing.
>
> listarchive
Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It isn't just debian-boot; none of the lists I checked at random have
> been updated past that date and time. No responses have been logged in
> the audit trail either, which for an 'important' severity is disturbing.
If you're looking for an up-to-the-
8 matches
Mail list logo
