Hideki Yamane:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:37:05 +0100
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Remember to *remove* "--with python3" from d/rules as well. An explicit
>> "--with python3" will cause issues with Build-Depends-Indep and other
>> conditional usage (e.g. build-profiles).
>
> And does lintian warns it
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:37:05 +0100
Niels Thykier wrote:
> Remember to *remove* "--with python3" from d/rules as well. An explicit
> "--with python3" will cause issues with Build-Depends-Indep and other
> conditional usage (e.g. build-profiles).
And does lintian warns it?
--
Regards,
Hideki
Hideki Yamane:
> On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 15:38:14 +0100
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * The "dh-sequence- build-dependency" to replace the
>>"--with " parameter to dh in the debian/rules.
>>- Note that third-party add-ons may not have added the relevant
>> Provides to support this change.
>
On Sat, 1 Feb 2020 15:38:14 +0100
Niels Thykier wrote:
> * The "dh-sequence- build-dependency" to replace the
>"--with " parameter to dh in the debian/rules.
>- Note that third-party add-ons may not have added the relevant
> Provides to support this change.
Build-Depends: debhelper
Paul Wise:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> * debhelper generate a temporary writable directory for $HOME
>>and $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR plus clear all remaining XDG_* variables.
>>This simplifies packaging of tools that insist on writing to
>>$HOME.
>
> What is the
On Sun, Feb 02, 2020 at 03:08:32AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> > * Support for new execute_before_X and execute_after_X targets.
>
> Some folks on IRC mentioned that the shorter before_X/after_X would
> have been preferred by them.
Feel fre
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote:
> * Support for new execute_before_X and execute_after_X targets.
Some folks on IRC mentioned that the shorter before_X/after_X would
have been preferred by them.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 2:39 PM Niels Thykier wrote:
> * debhelper generate a temporary writable directory for $HOME
>and $XDG_RUNTIME_DIR plus clear all remaining XDG_* variables.
>This simplifies packaging of tools that insist on writing to
>$HOME.
What is the right approach for dis
>- a "searchmode=plain" line option can be used to parse the full
> content of a web page instead of searching only tags
> (#897382), useful for JSON contents. Example:
Cool, I just wrote a hack for such a functionality in one of my project :-)
Cyr
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:42 PM Xavier wr
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 11:42 PM Xavier wrote:
> devscripts 2.18.5 has been released and brings some new uscan features
> for developers:
These seem like a candidate for DevNews:
https://wiki.debian.org/DeveloperNews
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 05:42:16PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
>
> devscripts 2.18.5 has been released and brings some new uscan features
> for developers:
> - in git mode, uscan is now able to verify signed tags (#827065).
>Example:
>
> version=4
> opts="mode=git,
Le Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 09:55:08AM +0100, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
>
> The mipsel buildd rem has a new disk and the buildd dir will be moved
> which will speed it up a lot (PIO vs DMA)
Dear Florian,
this is good news: we can see mipsel getting better on the buildd stats:
http://buildd.debian.or
Just to followup ...
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> Ryan and me have been communicating on a hardware mod on rem - one of
> the mipsel buildds. Basically the machine is running on a PIO based ATA
> disk because of the fundamentally broken design of the IDE inter
Le Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:40:24PM +0100, Florian Lohoff a écrit :
>
> Ryan and me have been communicating on a hardware mod on rem - one of
> the mipsel buildds. Basically the machine is running on a PIO based ATA
> disk because of the fundamentally broken design of the IDE interface
> (abusing s
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:08:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 08:10:20PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier a écrit :
> >
> > it would be much more efficient to work on buildd
> > redundancy (or other improvements to the buildd network).
>
> By the way, is there a plan to solve
Le Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 05:36:21PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr a écrit :
> * Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 19:26]:
> > I am really thankful for Tim and Martin to work on a MIPS machine, but
> > currently we do not even know if there is a plan to make it a buildd,
>
> No, it will be a
* Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-11 19:26]:
> I am really thankful for Tim and Martin to work on a MIPS machine, but
> currently we do not even know if there is a plan to make it a buildd,
No, it will be a porter machine.
> nor if the problem is really a problem of load or just an un
Le Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:28:48AM +0200, Riku Voipio a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:08:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Sorry to be rude, but I am just so surprised that there is a such big
> > problem and that apparently nothing is done. If people are working on
> > the issue, just l
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:08:13AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Sorry to be rude, but I am just so surprised that there is a such big
> problem and that apparently nothing is done. If people are working on
> the issue, just let us know, they will get many kudos and everybody will
> be happy. In t
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to be rude, but I am just so surprised that there is a such big
> problem and that apparently nothing is done. If people are working on
> the issue, just let us know, they will get many kudos and everybody will
> be happy. In the absence of any co
On 6/29/06, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
>> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated,
Hello,
On Wed, 28.06.2006 at 23:20:46 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please look for your name (or your team) in the list below and start
> updating those as well!
I'm expecting to update roundup this or the next weekend at the latest
to fix all currently outstanding bugs, i
Le jeu 29 juin 2006 16:37, Sam Morris a écrit :
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> >> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
> >> About 60% of the Python modules have already been update
On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:25:17 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
>> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated, but 109
>> are left to be done:
>> http://bugs.debia
Le mer 28 juin 2006 23:20, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> So you don't have any excuse to not update your packages any more.
> About 60% of the Python modules have already been updated, but 109
> are left to be done:
> http://bugs.debian.org/from:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The bugs have been filled two wee
On Wed, 28 Jun 2006, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> We also have many python applications (or badly packaged modules which
> have not been caught by the first mass-bug filing) that have a dependency
> "python (<< 2.4)" and that needs to be updated as well. Please find the
> list below (~150 packages). Th
Your mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been rejected because it contains an
illegal email attachment.
It was NOT received. Rule#2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Breaking news alert issue - big news coming.
Allixon International Corporation
A X C P . P K
We give it to you again as a gift. This company is doing
incredible things. They have cash and have made great
strategic aquisitions. Current price is $4.70.
Short term projection is $8. This company ha
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 09:36:10PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:28:06PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > How about ensuring that all addresses on the Debian keyring are
> > > whitelisted by default?
> > As well as all gpg signed mail?
> Spammers are starting to u
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 06:28:06PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> > How about ensuring that all addresses on the Debian keyring are
> > whitelisted by default?
>
> As well as all gpg signed mail?
Spammers are starting to use faked pgp signature tags. The system should then
decode the signature
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 08:07:14PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:46:03AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add
> > > themselves by sending a mail in certain for
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:39:28PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
>
> We haven't seen this problem on the vorbis lists. We do occasionally
> get people who quote the entire reply from TMDA when authorizing
> themselves, but even so, it's better than a lot of spam and certainly
> better than closing t
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 12:46:03AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add
> >themselves by sending a mail in certain format to something like
> >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Only after that w
On Apr 20, Jarno Elonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How about keeping a whitelist database in which the users can add themselves
>by sending a mail in certain format to something like
>"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"? Only after that would mail from that address be
>accepted without bouncing. That shou
On Apr 20, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>why not use this trick also for posts to debian mailing lists?
Because it's *fucking annoying*?
--
ciao, |
Marco | [526 cuRlJMlIVOiyY]
> > Is there some reason why TMDA isn't being used? We've used this at
> > Xiph.org for the mailing lists for quite some time now, and I don't
> > think a single spam has gotten through yet.
>
> I don't know exactly.
>
> It's because most of the Debian lists have always been 100% open... and
>
> But for mailing lists it would be annoying to have to add an
> extra-header each time you want to write to the list. And there are
> people who don't use mutt or gnus and can't easily add arbitrary
> headers. I really think that this auto-approval thingie is just a
> temporary measure until we do
Le Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 10:47:55AM -0600, Jack Moffitt écrivait:
> Is there some reason why TMDA isn't being used? We've used this at
> Xiph.org for the mailing lists for quite some time now, and I don't
> think a single spam has gotten through yet.
I don't know exactly.
It's because most of t
Le Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 06:19:07PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli écrivait:
> > quantity of spam. As a first measure to avoid them I decided that any
> > email sent directly to the PTS should be auto-approved. Auto-approval is
> > easy, you just have to add an "X-PTS-Approved" header with a non-empty
> >
> > I just made an important change to PTS. Since the PTS email adresses
> > have been available on the web, they start collecting a significant
> > quantity of spam. As a first measure to avoid them I decided that any
> > email sent directly to the PTS should be auto-approved. Auto-approval is
> >
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 02:49:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
hi Raphael,
> I just made an important change to PTS. Since the PTS email adresses
> have been available on the web, they start collecting a significant
> quantity of spam. As a first measure to avoid them I decided th
On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Thierry Laronde wrote:
> After that the subjects proposed :
Proposals:
Debian Jr
Coding Parties
I expect more people with Laptops than last year (at least I know
one person who has got one ;-) ...). So lets organize topics top
*work* on in the evening ours
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roland Bauerschmidt) writes:
> Speaking of IA-64: Do we have a machine yet? AFAIK not.
Several Debian folk have acces of one kind or another to IA-64 hardware. I
am not aware of any IA-64 systems fully dedicated to Debian development.
I am in possession of an IA-64 box from H
Bruce Perens wrote:
> For the Debian part of the meeting, I could say something about use of
> Debian inside of HP, especially how it was used for the PA-RISC and ia64
> ports.
Speaking of IA-64: Do we have a machine yet? AFAIK not. Do you think HP
would be willing to make one availible to Debian?
Hi Thierry,
For the broader LSM, I can do an embedded systems course, using the
text of my series "Building Tiny Linux Systems" which is running in
"Embedded Linux Journal". The text of the series is being released
under the GFDL.
For the Debian part of the meeting, I could say something about us
Ian,
My main concern is whether we are getting completely clueless people who
are not interested in Linux at all on debian-devel because of the news
gateway. If that is not the case, I dont' have justification to remove it.
I don't see a reason to take it off the gateway because it would
"unsettle
Ian:
> Bruce:
> > Chris says that all of the mailing lists are gatewayed one-way only,
> > and there is no mention of the list address in the headers. Thus, he
> > thinks that the people who are finding our list by mistake are doing
> > it through some other means. Does this mean that they are find
Please disregarde the first 10 line of my previous message. (Error with the
mouse).
__
Please do not look directly into laser with remaining eye.
E-Mail: Mark Ciciretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14-Dec-97
Time: 21:16:00
--
--
TO U
Add the line
User-agent: *
Disallow: /BugsDisallow: /Bugs
/Disallow: /Bugs/
On 13-Dec-97 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does this mean that they are finding it through our own
> WWW archives of the mailing lists?
Yes. Search indexes like Yahoo index the whole site.
> Do we need to add somethin
On Sun, Dec 14 1997 1:09 GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> We should be cognizant that people do troll for mailto: URLs and spam them.
This is the real problem IMO with the problem below.
> The major problem is that the WWW list
On 14 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Does this mean we shouldn't include the list addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > in our web pages? If so, I guess I have to fix some pages...
>
> I don't have a problem with the list addresses being in the WW
From: Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Does this mean we shouldn't include the list addresses ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> in our web pages? If so, I guess I have to fix some pages...
I don't have a problem with the list addresses being in the WWW pages.
We should be cognizant that people do tro
On 13 Dec 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chris says that all of the mailing lists are gatewayed one-way only,
> and there is no mention of the list address in the headers. Thus, he thinks
> that the people who are finding our list by mistake are doing it through
> some other means. Does this mean
53 matches
Mail list logo
