On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:15:08AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 April 2008 10:31, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Not sure about just symlinking. I'd rather say it should be:
> >
> > To use this package, you need to install dpatch.
> >
> > Once installed, please see /usr/share/doc/d
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.1846 +0200]:
>> I'm guessing that you missed that this is exactly what the
>> proposal allows for. You may want to read it again. :)
> So it seems. The sample you quoted is surely misleading,
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.1846 +0200]:
> I'm guessing that you missed that this is exactly what the
> proposal allows for. You may want to read it again. :)
So it seems. The sample you quoted is surely misleading, in that
case. I saw it and my redundancy detection
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> *Only* if the build system differs, people should put additional
> comments into README.source. I could at least agree to force people to
> make a comment like
>
> "[..] This package use (quilt|dpatch). ...
>... read /usr/share/doc/(dpatch|quilt)
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.0113 +0200]:
>> Here is a sample of the sort of documentation that would satisfy this
>> recommendation, written for a package that's using quilt:
> Might I suggest that for such cases, a common
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:31:30 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.1535
> +0200]:
>> Full ACK. I'd also like to see one for dpatch. Possibly something
>> that can just be symlinked too.
> Not sure about just symlinking.
Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2008, 14:47 + schrieb Peter Makholm:
> Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > This is some kind of stupid! You expect every package, that uses quilt
> > or dpatch to ship the same quilt/dpatch documentation?
>
> You did read the part of the proposal saying:
>
On Tuesday 29 April 2008 10:31, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.1535
+0200]:
> > Full ACK. I'd also like to see one for dpatch. Possibly something
> > that can just be symlinked too.
>
> Not sure about just symlinking. I'd rather say it shou
Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This is some kind of stupid! You expect every package, that uses quilt
> or dpatch to ship the same quilt/dpatch documentation?
You did read the part of the proposal saying:
This explanation may refer to a documentation file installed by one of
th
also sprach Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.1535 +0200]:
> Full ACK. I'd also like to see one for dpatch. Possibly something
> that can just be symlinked too.
Not sure about just symlinking. I'd rather say it should be:
To use this package, you need to install dpatch.
Onc
Am Montag, den 28.04.2008, 16:13 -0700 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> After extensive discussion in Bug#250202 and elsewhere on how to handle
> the increasing variety of different build and patch systems in Debian, the
> consensus on the debian-policy list is to recommend adding a new
> documentation fil
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.0113 +0200]:
>> Here is a sample of the sort of documentation that would satisfy this
>> recommendation, written for a package that's using quilt:
>
> Might I suggest that for such cases, a common file explaining how
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 03:00:40PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.0113 +0200]:
> > Here is a sample of the sort of documentation that would satisfy this
> > recommendation, written for a package that's using quilt:
>
> Might I suggest that
also sprach Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.29.0113 +0200]:
> Here is a sample of the sort of documentation that would satisfy this
> recommendation, written for a package that's using quilt:
Might I suggest that for such cases, a common file explaining how to
use quilt can be used or be
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> This new recommendation is *not* RC for lenny, only a recommendation.
>>> However, it is still a recommendation that most affected packages don't
>>> curren
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This new recommendation is *not* RC for lenny, only a recommendation.
>> However, it is still a recommendation that most affected packages don't
>> currently follow, so I wanted to give the development c
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This new recommendation is *not* RC for lenny, only a recommendation.
> However, it is still a recommendation that most affected packages don't
> currently follow, so I wanted to give the development community a heads-up
> on this change.
Can this be sav
17 matches
Mail list logo
