Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about:
> "Docks, launchers, clocks, and other applets to add general features to
> a graphical environment, but not system configuration tools."
> Removed "mouse utilities" because it is too general. Also changed
> "programs" to "applets" to make
Hi,
* Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 11:12]:
> Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
> > change of desktop behaviour in my opinion is not a "system-change".
>
> It is. If you change your desktop environment to use single-click
> instead of double-click, is that not a "system change"?
No? It's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery wrote:
>> We need a good definition for the section, so that it would not become a
>> dump for packages that do not fit elsewhere. Ideas?
>
> "Docks, program launchers, clocks, mouse utilities, and other programs to
> add general feature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nico Golde wrote:
> In my opinion it would be nice to have some kind of misc
> subsection for every section to have a workaround this, just
> like the wildcard tags in debtags.
No it would not. Already discussed and rejected.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nico Golde wrote:
> I don't really have a better section proposal but I don't
> really think it fits there because I would not search for a
> general user tool in a section for root tools. Also the
The definition of System/Administration is "Admin
Hi,
* Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-24 21:57]:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> >> I wonder if Applications/Desktop would make sense, for desktop utilities,
> >> which seems to be the term most used for this kind of thing.
> >
> > Rather Applications/"Desktop utilities" then, but I thi
Hi,
* Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-24 12:33]:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
[...]
> > I do see the need for some sort of general category for that kind of
> > thing. Applications/Tools is way too general-sounding, though, and I
> > agree with removing that.
>
> What about System/Administr
Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Rather Applications/"Desktop utilities" then, but I think that would be
>> a sensible addition.
> We need a good definition for the section, so that it would not become a
> dump for packages that do not fit elsewhere. Ideas?
"Do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery wrote:
>> What about System/Administration? It fits there because a) it changes
>> the way your desktop environment behaves, and b) you would usually only
>> start it once per session.
>
> This isn't horrible, but I don't think it's a pa
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think there are a fair number. While a lot of them can find room
> elsewhere (such as Games/Toys for things like xeyes),
I really wouldn't look for xeyes in Games. I use it not too rarely,
just as a "mouse cursor magnifier" when working in brigth sun
Linas Žvirblis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about System/Administration? It fits there because a) it changes
> the way your desktop environment behaves, and b) you would usually only
> start it once per session.
This isn't horrible, but I don't think it's a particularly great
solution. I t
Linas Žvirblis ha scritto:
> What about System/Administration? It fits there because a) it changes
> the way your desktop environment behaves, and b) you would usually
> only start it once per session.
This seems to be the best solution, even if fbpanel (or others similar
apps) aren't administrati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Darren Salt wrote:
> What would actually be useful is for packages which provide lots of menu
> entries to use their own submenus. sgt-puzzles, which provides 27, is one
> such; with several other entries in Games/Puzzles, it gets a bit long...
If yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I was looking at the new menu structure to adopt it into my package,
>> fbpanel[1], that before it was in Apps/Tools. Now this section is been
>> removed and there's nothing else like this.
>
> I don't see an obvious place for
Davide Truffa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was looking at the new menu structure to adopt it into my package,
> fbpanel[1], that before it was in Apps/Tools. Now this section is been
> removed and there's nothing else like this.
I don't see an obvious place for this one either. Window Manage
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would not separate "Applications" and "Games" whatsoever.
[...]
This doesn't really help the original poster, who doesn't have control
over the menu hierarchy, and also doesn't really help get the menu
hierarchy changed, since that requires discussion
I demand that Eduard Bloch may or may not have written...
> #include
> * Davide Truffa [Mon, Jul 23 2007, 10:34:53PM]:
>> I was looking at the new menu structure to adopt it into my package,
>> fbpanel[1], that before it was in Apps/Tools.
>> Now this section is been removed and there's nothing e
#include
* Davide Truffa [Mon, Jul 23 2007, 10:34:53PM]:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking at the new menu structure to adopt it into my package,
> fbpanel[1], that before it was in Apps/Tools.
> Now this section is been removed and there's nothing else like this.
> These are the actual sections:
>
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
