Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> * Neil Williams
>>
>> | Just a thought - why use /usr/lib/$ARCH and /usr/include/$ARCH at all
>> | when it would (IMHO) be simpler to use /usr/$TRIPLET/ and put the entire
>> | package under
Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:44 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:03:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> >> So if we allow multiple packages to be installed at the same time whic
* Neil Williams
(Please respect my Mail-Followup-To and my Mail-Copies-To: never)
| On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
|
| > How would you then handle libraries that go in /lib? (Apart from the
| > fact that I think just using a subdirectory of /usr/lib is much neater
| >
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 08:33 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Neil Williams
>
> | Just a thought - why use /usr/lib/$ARCH and /usr/include/$ARCH at all
> | when it would (IMHO) be simpler to use /usr/$TRIPLET/ and put the entire
> | package under that, as we do with dpkg-cross currently:
>
> How
* Neil Williams
| Just a thought - why use /usr/lib/$ARCH and /usr/include/$ARCH at all
| when it would (IMHO) be simpler to use /usr/$TRIPLET/ and put the entire
| package under that, as we do with dpkg-cross currently:
How would you then handle libraries that go in /lib? (Apart from the
fact
On Tue, 2008-07-01 at 18:44 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 02:03:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> So if we allow multiple packages to be installed at the same time which
> >> divert the same file, then I think we have
6 matches
Mail list logo
