Re: Multi-level symlinks for default kernel

2003-07-25 Thread Mike Fedyk
debian-policy@lists.debian.org Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Multi-level symlinks for default kernel Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:17:27AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:29:59 -0700, Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL P

Re: Multi-level symlinks for default kernel

2003-07-25 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 16:29:59 -0700, Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Hi, I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am > with debian keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /. > I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable > by the boot loader because of

Re: Multi-level symlinks for default kernel

2003-07-23 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:48:33PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote: > > I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am with debian > > keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /. > > > > I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable by the > > boot loader because of softwar

Re: Multi-level symlinks for default kernel

2003-07-22 Thread Mike Fedyk
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 07:48:33PM -0400, Morgon Kanter wrote: > > I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am with debian > > keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /. > > > > I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable by the > > boot loader because of softwar

Re: Multi-level symlinks for default kernel

2003-07-22 Thread Morgon Kanter
> I am wondering if anyone else is having the same problems I am with debian > keeping the vmlinuz symlink in /. > > I have several systems where /boot is the only filesystem accessable by the > boot loader because of software raid, or possibly lvm (haven't done this > yet, but thinking about it).