Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:13:55PM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> > http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRelease
>> > (which has not been edited since 2009)
>> If you start linking to the wiki, take the right page:
>> http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseTimetable
>
> Can the other pa
On 2011-02-01, Simon Paillard wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>> * Goswin von Brederlow [110201 21:29]:
>> > > squeeze release live microblogging
>> [..]
>> > Is there a ToDo list of things that need to happen during the release
>> > process, id
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:34:48PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> * Goswin von Brederlow [110201 21:29]:
> > > squeeze release live microblogging
> [..]
> > Is there a ToDo list of things that need to happen during the release
> > process, idealy with ETAs? Something that gives an overv
Hi!
* Goswin von Brederlow [110201 21:29]:
> > squeeze release live microblogging
[..]
> Is there a ToDo list of things that need to happen during the release
> process, idealy with ETAs? Something that gives an overview without the
> distractions of funny and otherwise interesting facts about De
Paul Wise writes:
> squeeze release live microblogging
> --
>
> The Debian squeeze release will be live microblogged[4] to Debian's
> identica account[5]. Several steps of the release process are quite long
> and boring, so these quiet periods will be filled wit
On 2010-11-07, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Simon Ruggier wrote:
>
>> Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
>> include support for automating the process of submitting to
>> screenshots.debian.org? It would almost certainly cause a big incre
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:21:38PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...]
> To some extend the problem also exists for several command line
> applications.
[...]
> To implement this idea we should probably define a reasonable
> default xterm to get some consistency and put this information in
> the usag
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 12:34 +, Sune Vuorela a écrit :
> On 2010-11-17, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
>
> I don't really see why these packages warrants screenshots. their look
> is fully dependant on the chosen style (and the two ment
On 2010-11-17, Andreas Tille wrote:
> This argument is true for any application using GTK+ or Qt - would you
> conclude that also in this case a screenshot is not warranted? IMHO
No. e.g. seenig the layout of a editor, the structure of a IDE, the
appearance of a instant message program, ...
/Su
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:34:54PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
>
> I don't really see why these packages warrants screenshots. their look
> is fully dependant on the chosen style (and the two mentioned, GTK+ and
> Qt can actually look e
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:14:41PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or
> not. To do that it would need to regularly download the screenshots
> metadata and make use of it. Patches welcome if anyone wants to
> implement it.
I have no idea
On 2010-11-17, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
>> I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a
>> screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be
>> possible to exclude the screenshot feature for such packages? I
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:42:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
The Debian Pure Blends web sentinel has this screenshot feature for some
time and we stumbled upon the same question (without having a reasonable
solution). To some extend the p
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:42:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Some libraries warrant screenshots (GTK+, Qt for example).
>
> The problem is that there is no reliable way to differentiate between
> packages that it is appropriate to have a screenshot for and those
> that should never have a screen
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Why does the "no screenshot available" message need to be an image? If
> no screenshot is available why not insert the relevant text instead?
Currently packages.d.o does not know if a package has a screenshot or
not. To do that it would need
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
>
> > I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a
> > screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be
> > possible to exclude the screenshot featu
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Toni Mueller wrote:
> I guess the majority of packages don't lend themselves to have a
> screenshot. All libraries, and many daemons, come to mind. Would it be
> possible to exclude the screenshot feature for such packages? It always
> takes some time to find the
Hi,
On Sun, 07.11.2010 at 11:45:05 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Screenshots on packages.d.o
> ---
>
> You may have noticed that packages.d.o now includes screenshots[1]
> with a link to a the Debian screenshots site[2]. Where a screenshot
> isn't available a "No screensh
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 09:48:13AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > I suspect that wouldn't be received very well. I'll file it on debshots
> > though.
> There isn't much the debshots author can do if upstreams for the
> screenshot programs don't want support for uploading screenshots to
> screenshot s
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Simon Ruggier wrote:
> I suspect that wouldn't be received very well. I'll file it on debshots
> though.
There isn't much the debshots author can do if upstreams for the
screenshot programs don't want support for uploading screenshots to
screenshot sites.
--
b
Hello Simon,
Simon Ruggier schrieb am 07.11.2010 17:19:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Please file wishlist bugs on the relevant upstream bug trackers.
>
> I suspect that wouldn't be received very well. I'll file it on debshots
> though.
why not? just make it generic like
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Simon Ruggier wrote:
>
>> Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
>> include support for automating the process of submitting to
>> screenshots.debian.org? It would almost certainly
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
On 11/07/2010 05:38 AM, Simon Ruggier wrote:
> Hi all, please CC me on any responses, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.
>
> Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
> include support
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Simon Ruggier wrote:
> Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
> include support for automating the process of submitting to
> screenshots.debian.org? It would almost certainly cause a big increase
> in the number of submissions.
Pl
Hi all, please CC me on any responses, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.
Has anyone considered patching the screenshot tools of GNOME or KDE to
include support for automating the process of submitting to
screenshots.debian.org? It would almost certainly cause a big increase
in the number of subm
25 matches
Mail list logo
