Vasudev Kamath (2015-11-10):
> Christian PERRIER writes:
> > I think that Kibi's point is more asking "will you rename the udeb
> > package", which would then require a change in the D-I build
> > scripts
>
> Ah okay. No I will not rename the package.
OK. And yeah, that's mainly what I had
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath (2015-11-10):
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
> > Is this change going to impact the fonts-android-udeb binary package
> > which is now being used within the Debian Installer?
>
> No, as of now upstream git repository of android source provides 2
> fallback variants DroidSansFallba
Christian PERRIER writes:
> Quoting Vasudev Kamath (vasu...@copyninja.info):
>
>> > Is this change going to impact the fonts-android-udeb binary package
>> > which is now being used within the Debian Installer?
>>
>> No, as of now upstream git repository of android source provides 2
>> fallback
Quoting Vasudev Kamath (vasu...@copyninja.info):
> > Is this change going to impact the fonts-android-udeb binary package
> > which is now being used within the Debian Installer?
>
> No, as of now upstream git repository of android source provides 2
> fallback variants DroidSansFallback and Droid
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois writes:
>>
>> And reverse build depends on package kodi as reported by
>> build-rdeps script from devscripts package.
>>
>> I'm attaching a dd-list with this mail. I will start filing bugs against
>> all these packages.
>
> Is this change going to impact the fonts-android-ud
(Adding debian-boot@)
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath (2015-11-09):
> As per my communication with Dave Crossland ¹², fonts-droid is now
> superceded by fonts-noto. Newer version of fonts-android will no longer
> ship binary package fonts-droid. But fallback variants will still be
> shipped with new binary p
6 matches
Mail list logo
