Re: MBF: embedded copies of Python modules

2009-11-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, Jakub Wilk wrote: > I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding > copies of Python modules; more specifically: > - modules available as separate Debian packages: argparse, beautifulsoup, > clientform, coherence, configobj, elementtree, feedparser, mechanize, > p

Re: MBF: embedded copies of Python modules

2009-11-09 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] anatoly techtonik | Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable | standard version of some Module available in Debian? I personally | think that fit is a bad idea, because by upgrading such Module it is | possible to break Python Application that require older version of th

Re: MBF: embedded copies of Python modules

2009-11-08 Thread Russ Allbery
anatoly techtonik writes: > 2009/11/8 Jakub Wilk : >> I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are >> embedding copies of Python modules; more specifically: > Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable > standard version of some Module available in Debia

Re: MBF: embedded copies of Python modules

2009-11-08 Thread anatoly techtonik
2009/11/8 Jakub Wilk : > I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding > copies of Python modules; more specifically: Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable standard version of some Module available in Debian? I personally think that fit is a

Re: MBF: embedded copies of Python modules

2009-11-08 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Jonathan Wiltshire > rednotebook Because rednotebook embeds a copy of txt2tags presumably? This is because it uses some features in txt2tags's VCS that aren't yet released, and I'm already working closely with upstream to remove