Re: Library interface version question

2006-02-15 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Henning Makholm wrote: >>You are supposed to write an appropriate shlibs file, as described in >>policy �8.6. Have you done so? > My file is currently automatically generated by dh_shlibdeps, and says > "libargtable2 0 libargtable2-0". No it isn't.

Re: Library interface version question

2006-02-14 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Henning Makholm wrote: >Scripsit Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >>First, if I understand correctly, programs linked against this new >>library (which should still be called "libargtable2-0") should have a >>specific ">=" version in their dependencies. This does not currently >>happen.

Re: Library interface version question

2006-02-13 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Shachar Shemesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > First, if I understand correctly, programs linked against this new > library (which should still be called "libargtable2-0") should have a > specific ">=" version in their dependencies. This does not currently > happen. You are supposed to write an a

Re: Library interface version question

2006-02-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:57:24AM +0200, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > I am maintaining a package (libargtable2, not that it matters). This > library had a recent backwards compatible interface version upgrade. The > previous version was 0, and the new version is 1, backwards compatible > to 0. It got