Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-11 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le dimanche, 11 novembre 2012 10.25:05, Thomas Koch a écrit : > .oO(One day all maintainers will use Git... :-) … the same way, of course. OdyX signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-11 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Thomas Koch writes: > Ansgar Burchardt: >> Thomas Koch writes: >> > For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should >> > commit the source code to a public readable Git repository and put a >> > signed tag on it. >> >> I do not think that is a good idea: >> >> You would end

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-11 Thread Thomas Koch
Ansgar Burchardt: > Thomas Koch writes: > > For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should > > commit the source code to a public readable Git repository and put a > > signed tag on it. > > I do not think that is a good idea: > > You would end with two repositories for packa

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On 08/11/2012 11:26, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > >> For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should commit >> the >> source code to a public readable Git repository and put a signed tag on it. > > While we are discussing wacky ideas

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should commit the > source code to a public readable Git repository and put a signed tag on it. While we are discussing wacky ideas, there is a derivative putting the entire installed

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Daniel Baumann
[ not implying that the original idea of importing packages automatically into git is necessarily a good one.. however.. ] On 11/07/2012 05:09 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >> We have the same trouble with snapshot.debian.org, and Alioth, no? > > No, since we can black out packages there in the rare

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 07 Nov 2012, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > It has the same problems with non-free files in the history as 3.0 > (git). Actually worse as the maintainer cannot remove parts of the > history in a later upload. in such cases just 'git filter-branch' that repository, and replace with a filtered

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Thomas Goirand > > It has the same problems with non-free files in the history as 3.0 > > (git). Actually worse as the maintainer cannot remove parts of the > > history in a later upload. > > We have the same trouble with snapshot.debian.org, and Alioth, no? No, since we can black out packa

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 11/07/2012 05:21 PM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Thomas Koch writes: >> For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should commit >> the >> source code to a public readable Git repository and put a signed tag on it. +1 I would use such service! > I do not think that is a good

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Thomas Koch writes: > For every debian source package that enters the archive, dak should commit > the > source code to a public readable Git repository and put a signed tag on it. I do not think that is a good idea: You would end with two repositories for packages maintained in Git. It has t

Re: Let dak commit all source packages to Git

2012-11-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 09:36:39AM +0100, Thomas Koch a écrit : > Hi Michael, Zack, et al, > > thank you Michael for codesearch. Since somebody asked about code browsing > and > Zack is interested in some source.debian.org I wanted to mention my dream: > > For every debian source package that e