On 2013-04-22 21:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-04-22 07:31, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install
>> multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of
>> them, and compare that the packages created by the first instance
>>
* Andreas Beckmann , 2013-04-25, 21:27:
what would be the correct severity?
I've been using important (or normal, if only toy^Wexotic architectures
were affected) for such file conflicts, regardless of whether you were
able to reproduce the bug in practice by co-installing the packages in
qu
* Andreas Beckmann , 2013-04-25, 21:27:
trying to overwrite shared '/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libffi.so.5.0.10',
which is different from other instances of package libffi5-dbg:i386
#650106
Maybe this shouldn't have been MA:same.
There's no problem with -dbg packages being MA:same. They just ne
On 2013-04-22 21:38, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-04-22 07:31, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install
>> multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of
...
> Actually I already tried something similar some time ago, although
On 2013-04-22 07:31, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install
> multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of
> them, and compare that the packages created by the first instance
> are not removed, and that other files do not get mo
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:51:01PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> The following snippet seems suspect, although not a big issue anyway
> as it's just removing a cache file, although it might leave files
> behind on remove/purge:
>
> ,---
> if [ -d /usr/lib/gio/modules ]; then
> # Purge the ca
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 19:06:52 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 22.04.2013 17:24, schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > Other problems might be when maintainer scripts use the running dpkg
> > architecture instead of the package architecture (DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH)
> > to decide when to do stuff, for example
Am 22.04.2013 17:24, schrieb Guillem Jover:
> Other problems might be when maintainer scripts use the running dpkg
> architecture instead of the package architecture (DPKG_MAINTSCRIPT_ARCH)
> to decide when to do stuff, for example in libglib2.0-0.postrm.
Handling multi-arch in the maintainers sc
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 16:06:05 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:31:54AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install
> > multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of
> > them, and compare that the pack
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:31:54AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> I guess a way to detect those could be piuparts runs that install
> multiple instances of Multi-Arch:same packages, purge just one of
> them, and compare that the packages created by the first instance
> are not removed, and that othe
10 matches
Mail list logo
