[Andreas Beckmann]
> Looks like we should start doing some automated upgrade tests with
> aptitude ... jenkins.debian.net would be one solution, piuparts
> another (anybody who wants to write a patch?).
A few years ago I did chroot upgrade tests like the one done by
jenkins.debian.net, using both
> > > Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
> > > annoying until I found that in the options menu as I ran out of space a
> > > couple of times.
> >
> > as does apt-get.
>
> I'm fairly sure synaptic doesn't select recommended by default, however
> the synapt
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 06:15:12PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2013-04-09 17:57, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> [...]
> >>> I'm not sure if it makes sense to recommend aptitude in its present state.
> >> I wouldn't recommend it when operating with multiarch enabled. Otherwise
> >> it's
> >> mostly f
> > Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
> > annoying until I found that in the options menu as I ran out of space a
> > couple of times.
>
> as does apt-get.
I'm fairly sure synaptic doesn't select recommended by default, however
the synaptic package itself is
On 2013-04-09 17:57, Osamu Aoki wrote:
[...]
>>> I'm not sure if it makes sense to recommend aptitude in its present state.
>>
>> I wouldn't recommend it when operating with multiarch enabled. Otherwise it's
>> mostly fine.
Looks like we should start doing some automated upgrade tests with
aptitud
On 04/09/2013 11:57 AM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
Have you been able to get that effect from aptitude? It seems that
whenever it sees some trouble (sometimes even when plain apt-get would
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the
> >> dependencies
> >> satisfactorily the first
Hi,
> Le Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0300, Eugene Lychauka a écrit :
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.html#pkgmgmt
> >
> > Here we can read:
> >
> > "The preferred program for interactive package management from a
> > terminal is aptitude. For a no
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Wookey wrote:
> Is anyone actually working on making the aptitude multiarch-friendly, or
> planning to?
It appears so, see the bottom of this mail:
http://lists.debian.org/deity/2013/04/msg00027.html
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBS
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:29:09PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
[cut]
>
> I too am a huge aptitude fan. The curses UI is brilliant for working
> out what's up when things are a bit broken. However it doesn't deal
> with multiarch well so I've been stuck with apt-get trying to work out
> fro the tealeaves
Le mardi 9 avril 2013 13:29:09, Wookey a écrit :
>
> I too am a huge aptitude fan. The curses UI is brilliant for working
> out what's up when things are a bit broken. However it doesn't deal
> with multiarch well so I've been stuck with apt-get trying to work out
> fro the tealeaves what's wrong.
+++ Chow Loong Jin [2013-04-09 09:32 +0800]:
> On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> >> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the
> >> dependencies
> >> satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude in
On 2013-04-09 11:05, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
> annoying until I found that in the options menu as I ran out of space a
> couple of times.
as does apt-get.
--
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
> For instance, one of the (ugly) boxes I help admin recently
> had 1000 pacakges yet to update and > 60 security packages not done, and not
> enough space on the box to do them.
Aptitude installs all recommended packages by default which was rather
annoying until I found that in the options me
On Monday, April 08, 2013 18:43:06, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> > Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the
> > dependencies satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude install foo),
> > aptitude allows you
>
> >
On 09/04/2013 06:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the dependencies
>> satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude install foo), aptitude allows
>> you
>> to interactively pic
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the
>> dependencies satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude install
>> foo), aptitude allows you to interactively pick other solutions, or
On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 04:19:19AM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> Actually, in the event of aptitude not being able to resolve the dependencies
> satisfactorily the first round (from aptitude install foo), aptitude allows
> you
> to interactively pick other solutions, or tell it what to do:
Have
Le Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:02:27PM +0300, Eugene Lychauka a écrit :
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.html#pkgmgmt
>
> Here we can read:
>
> "The preferred program for interactive package management from a
> terminal is aptitude. For a non-interactive comma
On 08/04/2013 23:02, Eugene Lychauka wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.html#pkgmgmt
>
> Here we can read:
>
> "The preferred program for interactive package management from a
> terminal is aptitude. For a non-interactive command line interface for
>
On Monday, April 08, 2013 11:02:27, Eugene Lychauka wrote:
> http://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.htm
> l#pkgmgmt
>
> Here we can read:
>
> "The preferred program for interactive package management from a
> terminal is aptitude. For a non-interactive command lin
21 matches
Mail list logo
