On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Sure. Looks like a good candidate to start a new project with ?
> Especially since it contains more than 8 decades of data which can stand of
> value even if just archived and maintained.
>
> Probably we just host it on alioth and let interested part
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> But if there are many people with interest in it to maintain, I think we could
> set up a team and work together.
Lets do it. I'm in.
(however, with having huge number of packages holding in my arm, I'll
be occasional uploader (until you
Hi Pablo,
On Wednesday 16 Dec 2009 13:49:18 Pablo Duboue wrote:
>
> RS> Probably we just host it on alioth and let interested parties
> contribute to RS> and use it.
>
> RS> Any suggestions on a different name ? Or should we just use the old one
> ?
>
> What about GCIDE2? And what about mergi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
CA> You don't. You will be effectively maintaining a fork. You might consider
CA> changing the name.
RS> Sure. Looks like a good candidate to start a new project with ?
RS> Especially since it contains more than 8 decades of data which can stand
Hello Clint,
On Tuesday 15 Dec 2009 23:43:45 Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:24:48PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > The copyright file lists that the copy of GCIDE is archived. I am not
> > very sure who the current upstream is and if this database is still
> > actively mainta
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:24:48PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> The copyright file lists that the copy of GCIDE is archived. I am not very
> sure
> who the current upstream is and if this database is still actively maintained.
It is not. Upstream abandoned GCIDE on the grounds that WordNet
6 matches
Mail list logo
