On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 06:03:41PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
>
> > I'd support this -- we could also discuss the "distributed filesystem
> > approach" there. Could this happen between Friday (DebCamp) and Tuesday?
> > I have to leave on Wednesd
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hi
> > Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution? Also in
> > regards to cost...
> gittorrent[1] would be great for this.
> [1]
> http://blog.printf.net/articles/2015/05/29/announcing-gittorrent-a-decentralized-g
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> >> > +1
> >> > Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
> >> something like
> >> https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
> > Yes.
> >> ?
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:41:44AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Pedro Larroy writes:
> > Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution?
> > Also in regards to cost...
>
> I am a bit afraid about the long-term availability of any non-standard,
> new solution: Anything we imple
Andreas Tille writes:
>> I doubt that we can or should reproduce the catalogs from the
>> original exposures in Debian -- this would require disk space,
>> computing power and man power which we obviously don't have.
>
> May be ftpmaster might give some input here - if we are lucky one
> ftpmaster
Hi Ole,
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 10:36:56AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
> >> ? not sure if I would actually like to be "The Speaker" ;)
> >
> > Why not. Your mail contained someconstructove details that could
> > kickstart a discussion. There is not more needed in a BoF.
>
> I'd support this -
Pedro Larroy writes:
> Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution?
> Also in regards to cost...
I am a bit afraid about the long-term availability of any non-standard,
new solution: Anything we implement now (and used for Debian 9) should
be supported for the whole LTS time
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> > +1
>> > Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
>>
>> something like
>> https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
>
> Yes.
>
>> ? not sure if I would actually
Hi
Wouldn't a p2p system scale better than any server based solution? Also in
regards to cost...
Pedro.
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Philip Hands wrote:
> Troy Benjegerdes writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >> * Ole Streicher , 2015-07-17, 10:34:
Troy Benjegerdes writes:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Ole Streicher , 2015-07-17, 10:34:
>> >But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package
>> >size of 3.5 GB.
>>
>> Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
>>
>> * The biggest binary package
Hi Yarislav,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:58:32PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
>
> something like
> https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
Yes.
> ? not sure if I would actually like to be "The S
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > The "ultimate" solution we are aiming for (see http://datalad.org for more
> > information) is to utilize git-annex and "ship" either mere pointers to
> > git-annex sources or lean (without data) git-annex repositories which
> > fetch data from origin
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 09:38:06PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Ole Streicher , 2015-07-17, 10:34:
> >But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package
> >size of 3.5 GB.
>
> Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
>
> * The biggest binary package currently in the archive,
> ns3-doc
Hi!
On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 12:03:36 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
> > But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package size of
> > 3.5 GB. What is the best way to deal with them? Loosely following the
> > discussion about the Icedove icon
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Going to debconf15? may be we could have a BoF or just a lunch chat to
> > discuss this eye-to-eye? ;)
> +1
> Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
something like
https://summit.debconf.org/debconf15/meeting/333/bof-big-data-packages/
?
* Ole Streicher , 2015-07-17, 10:34:
But: These packages sum up to ~25 GB, with the maximal package size of
3.5 GB.
Well, that's a lot. Just as data points:
* The biggest binary package currently in the archive,
ns3-doc_3.17+dfsg-1_all.deb, is only ~1GB.
* The biggest source package, nvidia
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:03:36PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> Going to debconf15? may be we could have a BoF or just a lunch chat to
> discuss this eye-to-eye? ;)
+1
Would you register a large data set BoF in Summit?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUB
On Fri, 17 Jul 2015, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Hi all,
> again a question where I find it difficult to put it into one single
> box. However, please reply to debian-science.
> I am trying to get the package "astrometry.net" into Debian. This
> package exists for Ubuntu [1], but (with some minor ch
18 matches
Mail list logo
