On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:45:08AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> In my eyes no program at all should store caches in $HOME. There is
> $TMPDIR for that. Even small files can be a big problem, if you have
> several hundred users.
But if TMPDIR="$HOME/tmp" then you have the same problem. Further
On Wednesday 14 March 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 09:45 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
> > Against those grotesque
> > .fonts.cache-1 files (which are not only cache that should not be in
> > /home, but also system dependent thus even more do not belong there)
> >
Le mercredi 14 mars 2007 à 09:45 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
> Against those grotesque
> .fonts.cache-1 files (which are not only cache that should not be in
> /home, but also system dependent thus even more do not belong there)
> running fc-cache as root on all hosts regulary helps.
The sys
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> I just discovered today that some packages can store pretty huge cache
> data in my $HOME, and found that rather problematic. When I backup my
> home, I don't want to waste backup space or time to do it, because I
> have to check what eats space and te
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070314 07:51]:
> > I just discovered today that some packages can store pretty huge cache
> > data in my $HOME, and found that rather problematic. When I backup my
> > home, I don't want to waste backup space or ti
* Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070314 07:51]:
> I just discovered today that some packages can store pretty huge cache
> data in my $HOME, and found that rather problematic. When I backup my
> home, I don't want to waste backup space or time to do it, because I
> have to check what eats spac
6 matches
Mail list logo
