On 2021-09-20 02:18:48 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
> they need to work with our upstreams too, especially the Linux
> kernel community.
[...]
A majority of the contributors to StarlingX are currently employed
at Wind River and Intel, and I think both organizations already have
a few peop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 2021-09-20 at 02:11 +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:40 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2021-09-19 01:24:32 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:35 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > > >
>
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:57 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> According to meeting minutes from last week, it looks like that is
> either already happening or at least planned/intended:
>
> http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2021-September/012048.html
Excellent, that is good to see.
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:40 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2021-09-19 01:24:32 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:35 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > > http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2021-September/012058.html
> >
> > Hmm, this site has a confusing way
On 2021-09-19 21:34:43 +0200 (+0200), Thomas Goirand wrote:
[...]
> In all logic, considering what starlingx is, if they had the intention
> to upstream some patches, I should have known, no? Well, so far, they
> didn't get in touch...
>
> My mum always says: the road to hell is paved with good in
On 9/19/21 2:57 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2021-09-19 01:24:17 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
> [...]
>> Jeremy Stanley pointed out that this is for the StarlingX project,
>> please consider merging StarlingX changes back to Debian and our
>> upstream projects and contributing new packages bac
On 2021-09-19 01:24:17 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
> Jeremy Stanley pointed out that this is for the StarlingX project,
> please consider merging StarlingX changes back to Debian and our
> upstream projects and contributing new packages back into Debian
> itself.
[...]
According to meeti
On 2021-09-19 01:24:32 + (+), Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:35 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
[...]
> > http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2021-September/012058.html
>
> Hmm, this site has a confusing way of not supporting https.
[...]
Thanks for the feedback!
Hi Jeremy,
Yes, this is about use of Debian builds in the starlingx.
Regards,
Danishka
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 8:05 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2021-09-18 13:59:17 +0500 (+0500), Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 02:17:59PM +0530, open infra wrote:
> > > How build a packa
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:35 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> As I understand it, the context here is bootstrapping a new "edge
> networking" focused Debian derivative with a number of third-party
> patches to existing source packages:
Thanks for pointing this out, asked them to contribute back to Debi
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 8:48 AM open infra wrote:
> How build a package A where it has a circular dependent package B (where
> package B is depend on package A).
Jeremy Stanley pointed out that this is for the StarlingX project,
please consider merging StarlingX changes back to Debian and our
u
On 2021-09-18 13:59:17 +0500 (+0500), Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 02:17:59PM +0530, open infra wrote:
> > How build a package A where it has a circular dependent package
> > B (where package B is depend on package A).
>
> It depends. Do you have a question about specific p
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 02:17:59PM +0530, open infra wrote:
> How build a package A where it has a circular dependent package B (where
> package B is depend on package A).
You try not to, at all costs.
Bastian
--
A woman should have compassion.
-- Kirk, "Catspaw", stardate 3018
On 2021-09-18 14:17 +0530, open infra wrote:
>Hi,
>How build a package A where it has a circular dependent package B (where
>package B is depend on package A).
Once they are both in the archive it's not a problem. You just
specifiy the dependencies and build each against the version o
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 02:17:59PM +0530, open infra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How build a package A where it has a circular dependent package B (where
> package B is depend on package A).
It depends.
Do you have a question about specific packages? And why do you need to
build them?
--
WBR, wRAR
signa
15 matches
Mail list logo