Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution

2024-09-27 Thread Bernd Schubert
Hi László, On 9/26/24 21:12, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:46 PM Bernd Schubert > wrote: >> I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a >> distribution? > In what sense? Upstream ABI breakages don't help, I wait for 3.17 at > least if that helps

Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution

2024-09-26 Thread GCS
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 9:46 PM Bernd Schubert wrote: > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > distribution? In what sense? Upstream ABI breakages don't help, I wait for 3.17 at least if that helps - not upgrading it to middle versions. > As you can see here https://g

Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution

2024-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 12:48:03AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > > > distribution? > > > > Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. > > > > "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages again

Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution

2024-09-25 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Thu, 2024-09-26 at 01:31 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > > distribution? > > Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. > > "I'm assumi

Re: How painful is a lib(fuse) .so version bump for a distribution

2024-09-25 Thread Andrey Rakhmatullin
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 09:38:26PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > I would like to ask how painful is a library (libfuse) .so for a > distribution? Not at all, if all revdeps build fine with the bumped version. "I'm assuming that distributions do not recompile packages against a new library versio