On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 12:35:31 +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Will it be possible to have more than one homepage listed, comma-separated?
Because dpkg does not have any direct use for it, it's not checking for
the validity of the values. So technically, yes, you could. The question
though is, do we w
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 13:03:32 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I don't think it makes sense to have different Homepage fields on the
> > binary stanzas, but if someone can think of a case it might be useful
> > I could change it to override the source stanza field.
> I have
Hello!
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:05:54 +0200, Carl Fürstenberg wrote:
> I was thinking about this field, and "Homepage" sounds a bit
> ambiguous in my ear.
Not in mine.
> I would suggest changing it to "Upstream" instead.
No, please. "Upstream" could be more than "Homepage",
e.g. "repository", "m
Guillem Jover wrote:
> I don't think it makes sense to have different Homepage fields on the
> binary stanzas, but if someone can think of a case it might be useful
> I could change it to override the source stanza field.
I have one.
OpenOffice.orgs homepage is www.openoffice.org. Now, since 2.3,
Will it be possible to have more than one homepage listed, comma-separated?
Miry
2007/8/20, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Ok, just pushed the H
On 8/20/07, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> > > as that was what was
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:49:57 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> > as that was what was requested on 142324 and what has mostly been used
> > on the ps
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:17:03AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Ok, just pushed the Homepage field support into dpkg git. Chose Homepage
> as that was what was requested on 142324 and what has mostly been used
> on the pseudo-header in the Description field.
Wow!, that was fast, thanks!!
Can you
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I agree on the Homepage field. Many times I've been asked by
not-so-expert debian users on how to find the homepage of a package
shipped with debian. Passing through copyright file is not so easy and
probably even not so appropriate.
A "Homepage:" field would then be okay?
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:56:18PM +0200, Xavier Roche wrote:
> > You can place in the description field of debian/control something
> > like: Homepage: .. to provide the original package homepage.
>
> What do you mean? Adding an unexpected field to
Hi,
ich hatet dir ja eine eMail geschrieben mit meiner
neuen Homepage-URL. Leider ist mir dabei ein Fehler unterlaufen. Die richtige
Adresse lautet:
http://susan.5xx.net
ich fände es schön, wenn du dir die Seite mal
anschaust und einen Eintrag in meinem Gästebuch hinterlässt.
Deine S
11 matches
Mail list logo
