On 14/10/07 at 01:28 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 06:05:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > wnpp-alert may be useful to you - it will tell you if any of your
> > packages are nominated for adoption or are orphaned.
> >
> I guess maybe this package can be added to the deb-a-
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 06:05:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> > it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
> > At current, this
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:46:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> > Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
>> > dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:46:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
> > dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive is old and
> > deprecated.
>
>
On 12/10/2007 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> > If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> > it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
> > At current, this is going to be noted on -devel.
> >
> > I would like a message o
Hi,
On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
> dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive is old and
> deprecated.
I think you are on a wrong track here. It might be an example of a poorly
mai
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
> At current, this is going to be noted on -devel.
>
> I would like a message on the user
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:37:50AM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Steve Greenland wrote:
>
> > On 12-Oct-07, 02:13 (CDT), Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Proposed workflow
> >> -
> >> Suspicious packages are found by combining different metrics into a
> >> scor
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 12-Oct-07, 02:13 (CDT), Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Proposed workflow
>> -
>> Suspicious packages are found by combining different metrics into a
>> scoring system:
>> - popcon score
>
> You might need to be a little careful with this
Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained
>> or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both
>> cases, because they are often related. (useless
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 09:13:11AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained
> or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both
> cases, because they are often related. (useless packages tend to be poorly
On 12-Oct-07, 02:13 (CDT), Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposed workflow
> -
> Suspicious packages are found by combining different metrics into a
> scoring system:
> - popcon score
You might need to be a little careful with this one. A package can be
quite useful
All'incirca Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:13:11 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto:
> I think that the following makes sense:
> - For packages where orphaning was proposed: 50 days
> - For packages where removal was proposed: 100 days
I am not a DD, so my opinion is not ver
Scribit Michael Biebl dies 12/10/2007 hora 15:06:
> > - For packages where orphaning was proposed: 50 days
> > - For packages where removal was proposed: 100 days
> As sune suggested, 1 and 2 months would be enough imo.
As a compromise, the delay to orphan a package could be set to 1 month
when th
Lucas Nussbaum schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained
> or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both
> cases, because they are often related. (useless packages tend to be poorly
> maintained, and vice-versa).
I whole
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Josselin Mouette wrote:
>> Some additional info might also be useful:
>> - age of last upload
>> - WNPP status (O, RFH, RFA) (for how long?)
>> - Maintainer's MIA status
>> - number of packages maintained by the maintainer
>> - number of maintainers fo
Le vendredi 12 octobre 2007 à 09:13 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained
> or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both
> cases, because they are often related. (useless packages tend to be poorly
> ma
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 07:13:11AM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail tries to address the problem of not orphaned, poorly maintained
> or useless packages in Debian. The proposal below tries to address both
> cases, because they are often related. (useless packages tend to be poorly
On 2007-10-12, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
full ack to whatever you wrote here - and thank you for your nice work
with this.
> It's important to decide on reasonable delays.
> - If the procedure takes too long, it will be discouraging
I think that your proposed "times" falls
19 matches
Mail list logo
