Guillem Jover writes:
> On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 14:40:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> > As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this
>> > is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I
>> > think we shou
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [120612 13:10]:
> 1/ we modify dpkg to ignore differences on /usr/share/doc/*/changelog.*gz
> for multi-arch: same packages
Doesn't sound too bad to me, at least for short-term (where I'd tend
to take the changelog-version of the main architecture on installa
Guillem Jover wrote:
> By definition a binNMU cannot produce a source package anyway, so I
> fail to see the point in this artifical need to distinguish “source”
> and “binary” changelogs through different files, AFAIR I already
Why "artificial"? Isn't it a completely natural and consistent view t
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > This allows us to get rid of the special-casing of bin-nmu in dpkg where
> > we only support one extension (+bX).
> >
> > We have many other cases where it would be helpful to be able to do such
> > binary-only rebuild in different environments and
On Sun, 2012-06-10 at 14:40:28 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > As I mentioned in the long ref-counting thread, I strongly disagree this
> > is a correct solution, it just seems like a hack to me. Instead I
> > think we should consider changelog (and cop
Hi,
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Asking to be sure: For sbuild, that means instead of changing the file
> debian/changelog before starting the build, a new file
> debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or however it is named) is created
> and from there on all works "by itself"?
That's t
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Do we have other tools than dpkg that parse the changelog to find out
> the package version?
Yes, debian/rules parses the changelog in a low-tech way in some
source packages. Someone with access to the lintian lab might be able
to say how many packages would be hurt by not
* Raphael Hertzog (hert...@debian.org) [120610 20:44]:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> >
> > > As such, I suggest that we handle "binary rebuild" differently:
> > > - debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
> > > => it define
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > As such, I suggest that we handle "binary rebuild" differently:
> > - debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
> > => it defines the ${source:Version} substvar
> > - debian/changelog.binary-rebu
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> As such, I suggest that we handle "binary rebuild" differently:
> - debian/changelog is left unmodified since it's the source changelog
> => it defines the ${source:Version} substvar
> - debian/changelog.binary-rebuild (or any other better name) is created
> when we wa
10 matches
Mail list logo
