Re: Help with Dillo package (attempt 2)

On Fri, 04 Apr 2025 16:24:28 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: >On Friday, April 4, 2025 4:14:23?PM Mountain Standard Time Rodrigo >Arias wrote: >> I was under the assumption that the Debian Developers were the only >> group suitable to perform the update. If this is not the case, I can >> ask around

Re: Help with Dillo package (attempt 2)

On Friday, April 4, 2025 4:14:23 PM Mountain Standard Time Rodrigo Arias wrote: > I was under the assumption that the Debian Developers were the only > group suitable to perform the update. If this is not the case, I can > ask around in case someone is interested in helping with the > salvage proc

Re: Help with Dillo package (attempt 2)

Hi, On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 03:59:24PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: If you have already made an effort to contact the maintainer without satisfaction, then what you are really looking for is someone to salvage the package. https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ pkgs.en.html#pa

Re: Help with Dillo package (attempt 2)

On Friday, April 4, 2025 3:50:13 PM Mountain Standard Time Rodrigo Arias wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 03:26:14PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > >Rodrigo, > > > >It looks like dillo is maintained by Axel Beckert . > > > >https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dillo > > > >He would be the first person y

Re: Help with Dillo package (attempt 2)

On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 03:26:14PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: Rodrigo, It looks like dillo is maintained by Axel Beckert . https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dillo He would be the first person you should probably ask about updating the package. TL;DR: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport

Re: Help with Dillo package (attempt 2)

Rodrigo, It looks like dillo is maintained by Axel Beckert . https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dillo He would be the first person you should probably ask about updating the package. On Friday, April 4, 2025 2:33:22 PM Mountain Standard Time Rodrigo Arias wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying again to rea

Re: help with build failing on powerpc?

Le jeudi 5 décembre 2024, 00:12:00 UTC+1 Salvo Tomaselli a écrit : > Hello, > > for weborf the build fails on powerpc. > > It seems that 1 test is failing and the others are passing, so I presume it > is > not something very foundamental that is not working. > > How can I access or reproduce w

Re: help with build failing on powerpc?

Hello Salvo, El jue, 5 dic 2024 a las 0:12, Salvo Tomaselli () escribió: > for weborf the build fails on powerpc. > > It seems that 1 test is failing and the others are passing, so I presume it is > not something very foundamental that is not working. > > How can I access or reproduce what a powe

Re: Help me with publishing package

On Mon, 2024-08-26 at 12:19 -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > Вероника, > > Thanks for working on preparing a package for inclusion in Debian. The > information you are looking for is on: > > https://mentors.debian.net/ > > If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Debian Mentors mailing

Re: Help me with publishing package

Вероника, Thanks for working on preparing a package for inclusion in Debian. The information you are looking for is on: https://mentors.debian.net/ If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Debian Mentors mailing list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/ On Monday, August 26,

Re: Help with the nftables package: the embedded python module

On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, 21:39 Jeremy Sowden wrote: > On 2023-07-28, at 18:59:45 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > > * Arturo Borrero Gonzalez [2023-07-28 18:38]: > > > I would appreciate additional suggestions and hints. Patches welcome. > > > > If you have bad interactions between the Python and non-P

Re: Help with the nftables package: the embedded python module

On 2023-07-28, at 18:59:45 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote: > * Arturo Borrero Gonzalez [2023-07-28 18:38]: > > I would appreciate additional suggestions and hints. Patches welcome. > > If you have bad interactions between the Python and non-Python parts > of your package, you can try and build them ind

Re: Help with the nftables package: the embedded python module

Hi, * Arturo Borrero Gonzalez [2023-07-28 18:38]: I would appreciate additional suggestions and hints. Patches welcome. If you have bad interactions between the Python and non-Python parts of your package, you can try and build them independently, i.e., override_dh_auto_build: dh_

Re: Help with a libzstd sparc64 FTBFS on the buildd

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 05:01:07PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On 06-04-2023 15:37, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > I feel like I cannot ask for an unblock from the release > > managers since the sparc64 buildd started failing on this package > > at some point in February: > > sparc64 is

Re: Help with a libzstd sparc64 FTBFS on the buildd

Hi Peter, On 06-04-2023 15:37, Peter Pentchev wrote: I feel like I cannot ask for an unblock from the release managers since the sparc64 buildd started failing on this package at some point in February: sparc64 is not a release architecture. sparc64 will not be better or worse if something mi

Re: Help with a libzstd sparc64 FTBFS on the buildd

On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 04:37:16PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Hi, > > The libzstd package in testing is currently missing a couple of > build-time tests and a fix for a very rare data corruption bug. > Both of these have been fixed in libstd-1.5.4+dfsg2-5 in unstable; ...of course this should

Re: Help patching files in dependency package

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 08:52:50AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 00:55 +0100, Tobias Wackenhut wrote: > > > What would be the cleanest way to package the new version with the > > mentioned patch? > > Ask the extension author to get the patch included into the upstream > rt5 cor

Re: Help patching files in dependency package

On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 00:55 +0100, Tobias Wackenhut wrote: > What would be the cleanest way to package the new version with the > mentioned patch? Ask the extension author to get the patch included into the upstream rt5 core, get a release of that, then get request-tracker-5 updated. Alternativ

Re: Help setting dbconfig-common for MariaDB, not MySQL

On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 17:08:25 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: >Hi Marc, > >On 02-01-2023 16:58, Marc Haber wrote: >> On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:31:17 +0100, Paul Gevers >> wrote: >>> On 02-01-2023 14:21, Alessandro Vesely wrote: A user complained that MySQL doesn't work, because it misses the INET6

Re: Help setting dbconfig-common for MariaDB, not MySQL

On Mon 02/Jan/2023 16:31:17 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote: Hi Alessandro, Hi, thanks for replying. On 02-01-2023 14:21, Alessandro Vesely wrote: please pardon my ignorance about Debian install.  I'm distributing a software which could use various DBMS'es by setting a number of parameters.  Examp

Re: Help setting dbconfig-common for MariaDB, not MySQL

Hi Marc, On 02-01-2023 16:58, Marc Haber wrote: On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:31:17 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: On 02-01-2023 14:21, Alessandro Vesely wrote: A user complained that MySQL doesn't work, because it misses the INET6 type that the example settings use. And is this an absolute must? (It's

Re: Help setting dbconfig-common for MariaDB, not MySQL

On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 16:31:17 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: >On 02-01-2023 14:21, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> A user complained that MySQL doesn't work, because it misses the INET6 >> type that the example settings use. > >And is this an absolute must? (It's an example after all?) It is. We need to st

Re: Help setting dbconfig-common for MariaDB, not MySQL

Hi Alessandro, On 02-01-2023 14:21, Alessandro Vesely wrote: please pardon my ignorance about Debian install.  I'm distributing a software which could use various DBMS'es by setting a number of parameters.  Example parameters are only given for MariaDB.  I distribute a debian/ directory that D

Re: Help trying to debug an sbuild failure?

On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:10:51AM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Note, that if you keep upgrading a Debian unstable chroot across multiple > releases, it will end up looking slightly different than a freshly > debootstrapped Debian unstable chroot. So I think there is value in >

Re: Help trying to debug an sbuild failure?

Hi, Quoting Theodore Ts'o (2022-12-27 05:19:45) > On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 08:45:53PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > El 26/12/22 a las 20:29, Theodore Ts'o escribió: > > > I: The directory does not exist inside the chroot. > > > > This is really a problem with schroot. I guess that this will not

Re: Help trying to debug an sbuild failure?

On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 08:45:53PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > El 26/12/22 a las 20:29, Theodore Ts'o escribió: > > I: The directory does not exist inside the chroot. > > This is really a problem with schroot. I guess that this will not work either: > > schroot -c the-chroot-name > > This usua

Re: Help trying to debug an sbuild failure?

El 26/12/22 a las 20:29, Theodore Ts'o escribió: I: The directory does not exist inside the chroot. This is really a problem with schroot. I guess that this will not work either: schroot -c the-chroot-name This usually works when you are in your $HOME because this file: /etc/schroot/default/

Re: Help needed for watch file after bitbucket changed download page

Hello Andreas, On 2022-09-29 14:54 4, Andreas Tille wrote: I confirm this works. However, uscan does not do the usual link to orig.tar.gz. Any idea why this is the case? I have found this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=896705 But did you have signing key from Rob Egan

Re: Help needed with a dh_shlibs failure on non amd64 platforms

On Mon, 04 Jul 2022 at 09:29:54 +0200, Martin Quinson wrote: > All libraries (eg libns3-bridge.so.36.1) that it cannot find are part of the > package. They are added to the debian/libns3.36/DEBIAN/shlibs Independent of the dh_shlibdeps failure that was already diagnosed, if these libraries are pub

Re: Help needed with a dh_shlibs failure on non amd64 platforms

Hello, Martin Quinson, le lun. 04 juil. 2022 09:29:54 +0200, a ecrit: > dpkg-shlibdeps -Tdebian/libns3.36.substvars > debian/libns3.36/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libns3-wimax.so.36.1 x86_64-linux-gnu is only valid for amd64. In ./debian/rules: -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RUNSTATEDIR=/run -DCM

Re: Help needed: C++ compile error with nix 2.5.1

* Thomas Koch , 2022-01-16, 11:23: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/5923 The first bad commit is: https://github.com/nlohmann/json/commit/0e694b4060ed55df (This happens to be also the first bad commit for , so I guess it's the same issue.) I

Re: Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

Hi Simon, Thanks a lot for your help. On 11/20/21 12:55 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > [...] > You'll notice -latomic appears *before* the various .a and .o files, but > in general, link order matters: each object on the linker command-line is > only used to satisfy the dependencies of objects that

Re: Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 11:31:04 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Latest Ceph doesn't build on 3 arch: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph&suite=experimental > > (plus the unofficial ports...) > > What worries me the most is mips6el, where the linker says "undefined > reference

Re: Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > What worries me the most is mips6el, where the linker says "undefined > reference to `__atomic_load_16'" (and more like this). I don't > understand because there really is a -latomic parameter to GCC when > linking, so it should be w

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Hi David, and thanks for your reply! On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 04:28:08PM +0200, David Kalnischkies wrote: > The self-inflicted joy of avoiding a transitional package (see also the > other thread about transitional packages on d-d@ I should comment) and > of too strict dependencies (just because its

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Hi, On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 10:00:29PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > We determined that the reason for users getting libqt5gui5-gles installed > is the qt5-default package. We removed it in October 2020 because it is no > longer needed. But the latest version of that package that ever existed ha

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Hi again David and all! I want to ask for the help again. We determined that the reason for users getting libqt5gui5-gles installed is the qt5-default package. We removed it in October 2020 because it is no longer needed. But the latest version of that package that ever existed had this dependenc

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Hi David, and thanks for your thorough reply and explanation! On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 12:15:01PM +0100, David Kalnischkies wrote: > To refine this: apt¹ picks the first alternative which is either: > 1. already installed and satisfying as is > 2. already installed, but needs an upgrade to satisfy

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 04:53:50PM +0100, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-01-27 16:15:17) > > I suspect that's not really the case - that instead apt tools might pick at > > random. > > no, apt does not pick at random. The apt solver prefers the first alte

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Quoting Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues (2021-01-27 16:53:50) > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-01-27 16:15:17) > > I suspect that's not really the case - that instead apt tools might > > pick at random. > > no, apt does not pick at random. The apt solver prefers the first > alternative. With t

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Hi, Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2021-01-27 16:15:17) > I suspect that's not really the case - that instead apt tools might pick at > random. no, apt does not pick at random. The apt solver prefers the first alternative. > It is my understanding that build daemons _ignore_ secondary entries > exact

Re: Help required to determine why some packages are being installed

Quoting Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer (2021-01-27 15:09:41) > So most packages now have an alternative dependency like libqt5gui5 > (>= 5.x) | libqt5gui5-gles (>= 5.x). The strange thing is that *some* > users upgrading from stable or reinstalling packages [1] get the -gles > variant inste

Re: Help with contacting Ubuntu devs for updating critically broken packages

Thank you, Norbert, for trying to get this fixed. calibre upstream already had 6 bug reports and counting in just the last week, for an issue: - that was fixed in May - only applicable to people field-testing the python3 transition which was marked as beta and is currently superseded by stable r

Re: Help with contacting Ubuntu devs for updating critically broken packages

Hi Scott, hi Andreas, thanks for your answers. On Tue, 13 Oct 2020, Scott Talbert wrote: > better discussed on an Ubuntu mailing list, rather than Debian. I have sent an email to ubuntu-devel with detailed explanations. I hoped for some contact here of a Debian *and* Ubuntu developer with exper

Re: Help with contacting Ubuntu devs for updating critically broken packages

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020 07:23:58 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: >Hi all > >(please Cc) > >is there a way to update hopelessly broken packages in Ubuntu Focal >LTS? > >(packages in question are onedrive and in particular calibre - I >refrain from commenting on the reasons behind calibre) > >Ubuntu seem

Re: Help with contacting Ubuntu devs for updating critically broken packages

On Wed, 14 Oct 2020, Norbert Preining wrote: Hi all (please Cc) is there a way to update hopelessly broken packages in Ubuntu Focal LTS? (packages in question are onedrive and in particular calibre - I refrain from commenting on the reasons behind calibre) Ubuntu seems to pull at arbitrary i

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

On Fri, Jul 03, 2020 at 07:50:55PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >... > One can install nodejs 10 along with libnode64, and build node-iconv > using libnode-dev 12 which links to libnode72. > > However, running node-iconv tests in the autopkgtests environment requires > the nodejs version that is linke

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Le ven. 3 juil. 2020 à 20:53, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit : > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-03 20:45:22) > > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2020-07-03 19:50:55) > > > I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: > > > from version 10 with abi libnode64 > > > to version 12 with abi libnode72 > > > > > >

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2020-07-03 20:45:22) > Quoting Jérémy Lal (2020-07-03 19:50:55) > > I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: > > from version 10 with abi libnode64 > > to version 12 with abi libnode72 > > > > C(++) addons like node-iconv can be compiled using libnode-dev, > > so i

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Quoting Jérémy Lal (2020-07-03 19:50:55) > I have a problem with the transition of nodejs: > from version 10 with abi libnode64 > to version 12 with abi libnode72 > > C(++) addons like node-iconv can be compiled using libnode-dev, > so installing an addon automatically installs the right libnodeXX

Re: help needed to resolve nodejs transition #963039

Hi Jérémy, On 03-07-2020 19:50, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Those failures seem to be preventing transition to testing (which is > understandable). > Two questions: > - how to fix the issue now One option is that the libnode72 add a Breaks on the broken versions of node-iconv, node-expat, node-* in testi

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hi! On 06.01.20 19:56, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: >>> On 28.12.19 18:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> >From your replies to emails in this thread I was wondering: do you mean >> that the Salsa team does not need, or does not want, help? Or does not >> need, or wan

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Ulrike Uhlig wrote: > Hi formorer, > > > On 28.12.19 18:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > >> I am sure there are many ways to help the team and it is not just > >> about Salsa/Gitlab admin stuff, but also about creating structure in

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hi formorer, > On 28.12.19 18:16, Alexander Wirt wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: >> I am sure there are many ways to help the team and it is not just >> about Salsa/Gitlab admin stuff, but also about creating structure in >> the team, triaging issues, spreading best practices

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 06 Jan 2020, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Alexander" == Alexander Wirt writes: > > Alexander> For everything else: we are working on it. > > I just want to confirm that part of the things that you are working on > is documenting the issues. At a number of points you've talked about

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

> "Alexander" == Alexander Wirt writes: Alexander> For everything else: we are working on it. I just want to confirm that part of the things that you are working on is documenting the issues. At a number of points you've talked about how people are misunderstanding the issues or are th

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Wed, 01 Jan 2020, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > ti 31. jouluk. 2019 klo 14.55 Alexander Wirt (formo...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > Also, if resources are an issue: I've offered several times to see if I > > > can get some k8s resources for g

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

Hello! ti 31. jouluk. 2019 klo 14.55 Alexander Wirt (formo...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > Also, if resources are an issue: I've offered several times to see if I > > can get some k8s resources for gitlab runners, but never got a reply. > > Not even a no.

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > > On 12/30/19 11:29 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > I don't think that salsa-ci is particularly problematic in terms of > > "efficiency". With the exception of the LXC usage, there's not much > > that can be "cut" to save resources. > > Also, if reso

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On 12/30/19 11:29 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I don't think that salsa-ci is particularly problematic in terms of > "efficiency". With the exception of the LXC usage, there's not much > that can be "cut" to save resources. Also, if resources are an issue: I've offered several times to see if I

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Mon, 30 Dec 2019, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise > > > some discussion around the topic: > > > > > > pe 13.

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Sat, 28 Dec 2019, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise > > some discussion around the topic: > > > > pe 13. syysk. 2019 klo 16.36 Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) kirjoit

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > Hello! > > I've seen many times before statements like these so I'd like to raise > some discussion around the topic: > > pe 13. syysk. 2019 klo 16.36 Bastian Blank (wa...@debian.org) kirjoitti: > > On Sun, Sep 08, 2019 at 05:35:10PM -0400, Sam Hartm

Re: Help needed: conflicting interests between Salsa admins and Salsa users (Re: Git Packaging Round 2: When to Salsa)

On Thu, 26 Dec 2019, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > I am sure there are many ways to help the team and it is not just > about Salsa/Gitlab admin stuff, but also about creating structure in > the team, triaging issues, spreading best practices for users and > helping the most advanced users to grow into a

Re: help

Hi! On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 07:09:18PM +, seydi mouhamadou moustapha ndiaye wrote: > I'm a student in computer engineering field from africa and I look for a > mentor who can  help me to accurate my computer skills mainly on coding. > That's fantastic, it's really good to see new people com

Re: help

Am 15.08.19 um 21:09 schrieb seydi mouhamadou moustapha ndiaye: > I'm a student in computer engineering field from africa and I look for a > mentor who can  help me to accurate my computer skills mainly on coding. Learn by doing. Install Debian on your laptop. Then pick a package you like or that

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb (Done. Now what?)

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:31:34PM +0200, dettus wrote: > Now that I am able to create packages What do I do with them? Read my link again. Also, the packaging help list is debian-mentors@. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb (Done. Now what?)

Hello. So, I succeeded! There are two Warnings left W: dmagnetic: description-synopsis-starts-with-article W: dmagnetic: extra-license-file usr/share/doc/dmagnetic/LICENSE.txt If you do not mind, I would like to keep them. Now that I am able to create packages What do I do with them? Th

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 07:19:32PM +0200, dettus wrote: > Running it ends with  the following feedback: > > > > > dpkg-buildpackage: info: full upload (original source is included) > Now running lintian... > W: dmagnetic: missing-depends-line > W: dmagnetic: description-synopsis-starts-with

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

Hello all. Thanks to your input, I think I am getting closer. For debian, I created a repository at https://github.com/dettus/ports_and_packages/tree/master/Debian In it, you will find a debian/ subdirectory. In which I put the files that seem to be required for debuild, if I am not mistak

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

Hi Thomas! On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:25:40 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Dettbarn wrote: > Hello! > > So, I have this awesome project, that I am trying to get into the > package repository of Debian. I already filed an RFP, which can be > found at the WNPP bug tracker, where it is gathering dust. > > https

Re: Help needed with a script generating a .deb

We don't use dpkg-deb -b to create packages. If you want to create a package that can be uploaded to Debian, start with https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Help request: Contribute to MariaDB 10.3 in Debian efforts

Hello fellow Debian Developers and those who want to be one! MariaDB is a big package and it needs help. I've updated the list of newcomer friendly bugs in mariadb-10.3:https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=mariadb-10.3 Perfect for anybody who wants to learn Debian pa

Re: Help to ship a better rsync on Buster

Hi, Looks like the new rsync 3.1.3-1 was uploaded yesterday. Thank you all for the work (and we may have a better rsync in Buster)! -- Regards, Boyuan Yang 在 2018-12-24一的 09:14 +0100，Paul Slootman写道： > Hi Samuel, > (replying above the message as it's all quite relevant but I don't have > anythin

Re: Help to ship a better rsync on Buster

Hi Samuel, (replying above the message as it's all quite relevant but I don't have anything specific to comment on) It's true that I have a lot less time nowadays than a couple of years ago to spend on Debian, unfortunately. This is becoming more and more obvious. Feel free to upload a new release

Re: HELP WANTED: security review / pam experts for su transition

On 08/12/2018 04:58 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Hello again, > > My previous mail didn't result in any feedback, so let me try again > with some more detailed questions that might be easier to discuss > related to the PAM configuration of su (and su-l). > FWIW I'm not sure -devel is very like

Re: HELP WANTED: security review / pam experts for su transition

Hello again, My previous mail didn't result in any feedback, so let me try again with some more detailed questions that might be easier to discuss related to the PAM configuration of su (and su-l). As people are likely aware, the su takeover has now happened and login (src:shadow) no longer ships

Re: Help: gpb buildpackage no longer builds

On Sunday, April 8, 2018 1:36:50 PM CDT Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Which version of debhelper are you building with? 11.2 > The cmake support was > recently broken and just fixed in debhelper 11.2.1, so make sure you get > that. Thanks for the tip! I'll upgrade and try again. -Steve s

Re: Help: gpb buildpackage no longer builds

On 08/04/18 20:25, Steve Robbins wrote: > In the last upload of googletest -- December 2016 -- I successfully used "gbp > buildpackage". Today, with zero changes, it fails to actually do the build: > it skips from configuration to running tests. > > The rules file [1] is, I think, pretty simple

Re: Help with install of debian stretch

boods...@yahoo.com > >I'm a newbie at Debian Linux and trying mybest but when I'm >installing Debian-9.1.0-i386-netinst, I get to a screenthat's asking >me to insert the disc labeled: 'Debian GNU/Linux 9.1.0 >_Stretch_-official i386 NETINST 20170722-12:43" in the >'/media/cdrom/" andpress [Enter] 

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome - Found reason

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > I found the reason: python-cryptography writes the certificate issuer > as UTF8 String while the CA certificate has it as Printable String. > Because of that, the subject names don't match bit-by-bit. Fixed: https://anonscm.debian.org

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome - Found reason

Enrico Zini writes: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > >> I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the >> certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome. > > I found the reason: python-cryptography writes the certifi

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome - Found reason

On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:36:55PM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > > > I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the > > certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome. > > I found the rea

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome - Found reason

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:37:01AM +0200, Enrico Zini wrote: > I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the > certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome. I found the reason: python-cryptography writes the certificate issuer as UTF8 String whi

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 02:08:38PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > FYI, Enrico, the openssl CLI tool can dump this kind of thing so you > can compare before and after. I forget the exact runes I'm afraid. openssl x509 -in <> -noout -text is probably the magic line you're looking for.

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:44 PM, Jeff Epler wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > GHash.hh:91:44: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template > > parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' > > while (pos > Nothing in this line is intended

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > GHash.hh:91:44: error: type/value mismatch at argument 1 in template > parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' > while (pos

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome

Re: Enrico Zini 2017-09-05 <20170905163334.2mi5tzacykzja...@enricozini.org> > I should have managed to do it, but chrome still doesn't seem to like > it. Can you generate a new certificate and see if you still find > differences? "openssl x509 -text -noout" doesn't show any differences anymore exc

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome

On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 12:16:47PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote: > My guess is that the new-style certificates are missing some > attributes: > > Old certificate from 2015: > > X509v3 extensions: > X509v3 Basic Constraints: critical > CA:FALSE > X50

Re: Help needed for #871234 FTBFS with GCC-7: error: type/value mismatch

Hi Alex! Alex Mestiashvili kirjoitti 05.09.2017 klo 14:55: parameter list for 'template struct std::hash' while (pos I think the problem is we don't want std::hash but GHash::hash and GHash::GHashEntry::hash. (Sorry, I haven't looked deeper into how to get the correct 'hash'.) Cheers, Juh

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome

  With Best Regards, Tim On 09/05/2017 03:08 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Christoph Berg writes ("Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome"): >> Re: Enrico Zini 2017-09-05 <20170905093701.xncmprl2x4so6...@enricozini.org> >>> I refactored the certificate gener

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome

Christoph Berg writes ("Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome"): > Re: Enrico Zini 2017-09-05 <20170905093701.xncmprl2x4so6...@enricozini.org> > > I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the > > certificates it generates now s

Re: Help, I broke sso.debian.org for chrome

Re: Enrico Zini 2017-09-05 <20170905093701.xncmprl2x4so6...@enricozini.org> > I refactored the certificate generation code for sso.debian.org, and the > certificates it generates now still work in Firefox but not in Chrome. My guess is that the new-style certificates are missing some attributes:

Re: Help me

On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:05 AM, МБУЗ ГКБ № 1 wrote: > Hi no work in Debian 8.8 > No start firebird 2.5 classic and super error Please contact our support channels for help diagnosing the error: https://www.debian.org/support Once you have diagnosed where the problem is, you can report a bug:

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 10:02:55 -0800, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Yes, but last time I checked a "apt-get source && debuild -us -uc" still > defaults to using just a single CPU unless you explicitly set > DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel. Check again - dpkg-buildpackage now defaults to -Jauto (it sets DEB_B

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

❦ 23 février 2017 10:02 -0800, Nikolaus Rath  : Your chosen build environment is not common [...] >>> >>> This has come up a few times now. Could someone explain what is so odd >>> about his envirnoment? It does not look unusual to me. >> >> Official buildd have several CPU. Most "important"

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Feb 21 2017, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 21 février 2017 09:48 -0800, Nikolaus Rath  : > >>> Your chosen build environment is not common [...] >> >> This has come up a few times now. Could someone explain what is so odd >> about his envirnoment? It does not look unusual to me. > > Official build

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 at 23:35:44 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Having said that, some ioctls that make sense for block-backed > filesystems, such as FS_IOC_FIEMAP, won't work on a tmpfs (or nfs, > ubifs, etc.). One notable omission is that tmpfs doesn't do generic "user." extended attributes (due t

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

❦ 22 février 2017 00:46 +0100, Adam Borowski  : >> > > * using a qemu build chroot (Debian doesn't do this, other might) >> > >> > Is that because QEMU is slow, or some other reason? >> >> AIUI qemu(-static) cannot handle threading very well. So if a build >> process uses such applications, thi

Re: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 14:18 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 02:37:23AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > * with /tmp on tmpfs on some archs > > > > [...] > > > > You mean the 64-bit PowerPC architectures?  tmpfs allocates at > > least a > > page per file, and they have 64K pa

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >