On 02/02/2017 01:29 PM, Riku Voipio wrote:
>>> I personally don't find "open core" projects to be fully free
>>> software, even if they follow current DFSG, OSI, and FSF criteria. I
>>> may be in a minority with that view, of course.
>
>> I am not sure what you mean with "debian", but we (git.d.
On Jan 30 2017, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I personally don't find "open core" projects to be fully free
> software, even if they follow current DFSG, OSI, and FSF criteria.
This strikes me as a little odd, though. So if the company that sells
the "closed shell" goes bust, would that turn the rema
Riku Voipio writes ("Re: Git hosting for code that provides Debian services"):
> OTOH I think the problem is not that "we don't have github workflow"
> but "every maintainer invents their own workflow".
The problem isn't the lack of agreement on gi
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:42:36PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Right, so the answer is that Gitlab is still an "open core" project. I
> > therefore repeat that I find it sad that it's being pushed as a
> > service for Debian to use.
> > I personall
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:31:41AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Sorry, my e-mail was poorly worded. I'd like to know why Lars thinks
> that they are not sufficiently free.
I don't want to spend much time on this (there are backups to make and
test) so I'll just link to the infinitely wise Bradley
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 09:53:49AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I personally don't find "open core" projects to be fully free
> > software, even if they follow current DFSG, OSI, and FSF criteria. I
> > may be in a minority with th
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 04:59:00PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Lars said that even though they are DFSG-free they do not satisfy his
> own personal Freeness criteria. He didn't suggest they weren't DFSG-
> free which is what you seem to have read (judging from the final
> sentence).
Sorry, my e-m
Dear Lars,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I personally don't find "open core" projects to be fully free
> software, even if they follow current DFSG, OSI, and FSF criteria. I
> may be in a minority with that view, of course.
Possibly we should change mailing lis
On Mon, 2017-01-30 at 09:53 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear Lars,
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 05:18:38PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > I personally don't find "open core" projects to be fully free
> > software, even if they follow current DFSG, OSI, and FSF criteria. I
> > may be in a minorit
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:16:59PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > On തിങ്കള് 30 ജനുവരി 2017 07:05 വൈകു, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > > Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the
> > > company?
> > >
> >
> > git.fosscommunity.in
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 07:16:59PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> On തിങ്കള് 30 ജനുവരി 2017 07:05 വൈകു, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> > Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the
> > company?
> >
>
> git.fosscommunity.in is running Gitlab Community Edition, code that is
> DFSG c
On തിങ്കള് 30 ജനുവരി 2017 07:05 വൈകു, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:57:46PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> The entire idea of that instance is to make a 100% Free Software public
>> git hosting service available to the Free Software community.
>
> Is the Gitlab software stil
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:57:46PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> The entire idea of that instance is to make a 100% Free Software public
> git hosting service available to the Free Software community.
Is the Gitlab software still an "open core" product of Gitlab the
company?
--
I want to build
On വെള്ളി 20 ജനുവരി 2017 04:59 രാവിലെ, Ben Finney wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
>> For a debian.org service, I would like to be able to check out the
>> running version without interacting with a proprietary online service.
>
> I have been looking at the GitLab instance hosted at FOSS Community
14 matches
Mail list logo