Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If you actually dig into the list, you'll find that many of the bugs
> with patches fall into the same category as these two. Most of the
> rest actually need significant attention
At Thu, 7 Aug 2003 18:25:27 -0400,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
> excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
> doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
> reviewing complicated or
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
> >And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
> ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 20:40, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
> >And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
>
> ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested
On Aug 07, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Do you think any DD reads those? Do DDs care about Bugs with patches?
>And don't tell me glibc is unmaintained or ppp.
ppp actually appears to be unmaintained. Many users requested essential
features like pppoa and kernel space pppoe su
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 05:34:20AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > It's not like a developer could do anything more, in these two
>
> That being true still doesn't help non DDs to contribute.
Indeed, but it also means that they are not reasons why people should
be given accounts.
> > case
* (Nathanael Nerode)
| However, not having enough time to chase down important bugs is no
| excuse for not reviewing simple patches to fix simple bugs, which
| doesn't take an awful lot of time at all. (It is a good excuse for not
| reviewing complicated or subtle patches.)
Once you have man
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
> > >
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:52:04PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
> >
> > http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=&include=patch
> >
> > See the form at
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:25:27PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
> >have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
> >insignificant ones like this.
>
> This is unfortunately true;
Andrew Suffield wrote:
>glibc is even worse. It has multiple maintainers, and they still don't
>have enough time to chase down all the important bugs, let alone
>insignificant ones like this.
This is unfortunately true; glibc seems to be severely broken on a
routine basis upstream. Kinda makes m
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > > access to packages with patch
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
>
> Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
>
>
Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> > access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
>
> Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start.
Good grief, how easy do we have to make it?
http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch
http://bugs.debian.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:42:36PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe an interface/filter for the bts that gives one a more easy
> access to packages with patches pending would be a start. Or a system
Try http://bugs.debian.org/tag:patch .
--
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, li
17 matches
Mail list logo
