On 08/30/2016 12:09 PM, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
> I don't know is it a time for GPLv4 which will explain to all
> corporations that THIS LICENSE mean you must participate with community
> and also make people aware that it is not only license but movement
> towards better humanity that cooperates all
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 05:25:49PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:29:56AM +0200, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
... and we're discussing all this on debian-devel because ... ?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli . z...@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o
Computer Science Professor
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:29:56AM +0200, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
> You're just fueling myths you stand behind for some reason. You take
> data from one year (did you even verify it on your own?) and you don't
> look at historical development of situation.
The data was compiled primarily by Jon Corb
On 09/05/2016 11:10 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
>> For years and years companies are using community hard work and creating
>> their "great" products without turning back
>>
>> People all over the world created Free software for d
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Zlatan Todorić wrote:
> For years and years companies are using community hard work and creating
> their "great" products without turning back
>
> People all over the world created Free software for decades and just
> small number of those people got em
On 08/30/2016 09:43 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://www.jonobacon.org/2016/08/29/linux-linus-bradley-open-source-protection/
> just popped up in my rss feed and I thought I'd share it with you… it's
> a comment on the recent GPL enforcement debate on the (upstream) kernel
> list.
>
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
