Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > 1.0.40 3196381 Sep 27 15:19 gnome-libs-1.0.42.tar.gz > > and recompile. Will be done in no time. Don't worry. But only if it is > installed in the archive by now (last time I checked it was stuck in > incoming). I just uploaded 1.0.42. I believe 1

Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 12:17:22PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote: Content-Description: Message Body > > I took a few minutes to check what versions of gnome packages were in potato > and in /incoming to compare against the current gnome ftp site. The first > column shows the version in debian and t

Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Christian Marillat
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > libgnobjc or something to that effect. > > I still don't see this package anywhere, I am either overlooking it > > or it is not packaged? > > I'm sure it's packaged. Don't remember the exact name (do

Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
Scavenging the mail folder uncovered Chris Cheney's letter: > 0.4.1 1166853 Sep 24 16:56 glade-0.5.3.tar.gz I have a package ready (I use glade heavily and I didn't wanted to wait.) If the author doesn't have the time to update it, I can NMU. Ciao, Federico -- Federico Di Gregorio [http://www

Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > libgnobjc or something to that effect. > I still don't see this package anywhere, I am either overlooking it > or it is not packaged? I'm sure it's packaged. Don't remember the exact name (don't use objective-c much :-). Mike.

Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Chris Cheney
> Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, no, it just means you're not aware of Debian's naming schemes > for library packages. > > > *** 541066 Aug 2 17:32 Gtk---1.0.2.tar.gz > > look for *gtkmm Ok I see it now. :) > > *** 313788 Sep 20 17:58 gnome-objc-1.0.40.tar.gz > > lib

Re: GNOME package versions

1999-09-28 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > *** means it does not appear to be packaged yet. Well, no, it just means you're not aware of Debian's naming schemes for library packages. > *** 541066 Aug 2 17:32 Gtk---1.0.2.tar.gz look for *gtkmm > *** 313788 Sep 20 17:58 gnome-objc-1.0.40.