On 20 November 2012 16:12, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed
>> by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do?
>
> There is, but I doubt the built packag
Hi there!
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:35:08 +0100, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I did built in sbuild, but not a VM. Is there pbuilder/sbuild backed
> by qemu/kvm available anywhere to make that easier to do?
There is, but I doubt the built package will be accepted, we already had
this problem in the pas
On 20 November 2012 14:42, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>
>> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arc
On 20 November 2012 14:28, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dmitrijs,
>
> am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
>> To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd
>> above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the
>> build packages..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 20/11/2012 14:35, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
> What's this: lucatelli Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-0.bpo.3-octeon
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=llvm-3.2&ver=3.2~rc1-1~exp3&arch=mips&stamp=1353416035
>
> Why is distribution (experiment
Dmitrijs,
am Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:03:52PM + hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> To be clear both at build time & run time. So why the mipsel buildd
> above is running a much newer kernel, since this can be leak into the
> build packages...? Or is it a new port for wheezy or something? (e.g.
>
also sprach Thibaut Paumard [2012.11.20.1403 +0100]:
> That's why we currently require a binary together with the source. It
> tautologically proves that you successfully built it.
Nope, it does not. It could also prove that you know how to use
changestool to engineer a .changes file combining a
On 20 November 2012 13:47, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in que
On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 12:37 +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> >> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
> >> with the host running Debian's kernel.
> >
On 20 November 2012 13:03, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
>> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>>> wrote:
I currently do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 20/11/2012 13:37, Dmitrijs Ledkovs a écrit :
> On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>> wrote:
>>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in
>>> question with
On 20 November 2012 11:45, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
>> with the host running Debian's kernel.
>
> So how can you prove that the package builds?
>
I can give you my
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:10:37AM +, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> I currently do not have facilities to build the package in question
> with the host running Debian's kernel.
So how can you prove that the package builds?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
13 matches
Mail list logo
