> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that
> the proper capitalization is 'Vcs-Browser', not 'VCS-Browser'.
> Thanks.
Why did you not s
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:36:48PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Is this field meant to point at the Debian repository or the
> upstream repository? (I assume the Debian one)
Both Vcs-Browser and Vcs-* are meant to contain the current development
copy of the repository used to build the offici
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Romain Francoise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note t
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:40:15PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> That only helps people who look now at it and it should be
> (I guess it will be) at least documented in the developers reference.
See #391023, it has been there since a few days after I announced the
support of Vcs-* fields in the PTS
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:23:17PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
> Is there a documentation/wiki/etc. of valid fields somewhere?
There have been documentation for XS-Vcs-* since ages in the BTS as an
addendum for the devref (#391023),
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:33:24PM +0100, Romain Francoise wrote:
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that
> the proper capitalization
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:40:15PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 21:31]:
> > Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> > > So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
> >
> > Vcs-*.
> >
> > > Is there a documentation/wiki/e
Hi Cyril,
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 21:45]:
> Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> > That only helps people who look now at it and it should be (I guess it
> > will be) at least documented in the developers reference.
>
> I know, just pointing to the existing bits
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> That only helps people who look now at it and it should be (I guess it
> will be) at least documented in the developers reference.
I know, just pointing to the existing bits of documentation I know of.
> Btw, looking at Vcs-* the changelog only says:
Hi Cyril,
* Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-29 21:31]:
> Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> > So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
>
> Vcs-*.
>
> > Is there a documentation/wiki/etc. of valid fields somewhere?
>
> There's dpkg changelog in ??
Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2007):
> So, should we use XS-Vcs-* or Vcs-* [1] in debian/control now?
Vcs-*.
> Is there a documentation/wiki/etc. of valid fields somewhere?
There's dpkg changelog in “etc.”.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Romain Francoise schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> The packages listed below use the 'XS-Vcs-Browse' field, which has
> been obsoleted by the new, official 'Vcs-Browser' field. Please
> consider upgrading your control files to use that. Also note that
> the proper capitalization is 'Vcs-Browser', not 'VCS-
12 matches
Mail list logo
