Re: First spam

2004-10-10 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/2004 07:29 AM, paddy wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > >>On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: >>> I'm actually sur

Re: First spam

2004-10-10 Thread paddy
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:32:06AM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: > > > I'm actually surprised it takes them that long. > > > debian-devel must be way down the target list. > > >

Re: First spam

2004-10-10 Thread Steve Greenland
On 09-Oct-04, 20:06 (CDT), Clemens Schwaighofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: > > I'm actually surprised it takes them that long. > > debian-devel must be way down the target list. > > probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :) Peopl

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Clemens Schwaighofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/2004 07:38 AM, paddy wrote: > I'm actually surprised it takes them that long. > debian-devel must be way down the target list. probably geeks don't buy viagra, home loans, online medicine, etc :) lg, clemens -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- V

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread paddy
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:11:02PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote: > > Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives > > might > > Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the > mailinglists

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004, Jesus Climent wrote: > Santiago has a bit of rationale... Some obfuscation in the list archives might Won't work. Spammer-database-feeders nowadays either subscribe to the mailinglists (not common), or get the data for a pletora of spyware in Winblows computers (really, REALL

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Jesus Climent
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC) > > First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC) > > > > If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to > > propagate from the Debian l

Re: First spam

2004-10-09 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Andre Majorel wrote: > First use of email address: 2004-10-06 18:56 (UTC) > First spam received at email address: 2004-10-09 17:12 (UTC) > > If you've been wondering how long it takes for an email address to > propagate from the Debian list archives to spammers, here'