Re: FTP arrangement

1995-10-03 Thread H.J. Lu
> > : this is great for backwards binary compatability, something Linux > : has excelled at. > > With all due respect, Linux has been worse about this than many other > platforms, especially where C++ programs are concerned. FreeBSD, for > example, has been more stable over the past couple of y

Re: FTP arrangement

1995-10-02 Thread Warner Losh
: this is great for backwards binary compatability, something Linux : has excelled at. With all due respect, Linux has been worse about this than many other platforms, especially where C++ programs are concerned. FreeBSD, for example, has been more stable over the past couple of years. SunOS an

Re: FTP arrangement

1995-09-28 Thread Eric Youngdale
>some significant complexity for developers of libraries. I'm not sure >how elf handles this -- possibly the program specifies which version >of the library it's looking for and there's an instancing scheme to >select one of several releases of a function for cases where there's >been an interface

Re: FTP arrangement

1995-09-28 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Murdock writes ("Re: FTP arrangement"): >Date: Tue, 26 Sep 95 12:03 BST >From: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I'm confused. I thought we had an incrementally upgradeable system ? >What is the purpose of the extra directory ? >

Re: FTP arrangement

1995-09-28 Thread Bruce Perens
I would also like to have the capability to switch between multiple versions of the same library. That would simplify a few multi-platform-GUI sorts of tasks. Figuring out how to do that using ELF has got to be simpler than figuring out how to make a shared ELF/a.out library. It might be _possible

Re: FTP arrangement

1995-09-28 Thread Raul Miller
Ian Murdock: No, I'm not saying this at all. I'm saying that fairly soon our primary emphasis (from a development point of view) will be the ELF distribution. We'll still update the a.out distribution, of course, but it'll become less and less of a priority from a development point