Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Not if you use pdebuild or similarly build in a chroot, which IMO
>>> everyone should be doing.
>
>> I use xen instances and that changes nothing at all.
>
On 17/07/07 at 11:53 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [Lucas Nussbaum]
> >> The problem is that it isn't required to have exactly the same source
> >> tree after "./configure ; make ; make clean". It's just required that
> >> "./configure ; mak
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Not if you use pdebuild or similarly build in a chroot, which IMO
>> everyone should be doing.
> I use xen instances and that changes nothing at all.
> 1. My ~/src is mounted inside the build environme
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Lucas Nussbaum]
>> The problem is that it isn't required to have exactly the same source
>> tree after "./configure ; make ; make clean". It's just required that
>> "./configure ; make ; make clean ; ./configure ; make" works. It is
>> possible that t
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
>>> row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
>>> doing a
[Lucas Nussbaum]
> The problem is that it isn't required to have exactly the same source
> tree after "./configure ; make ; make clean". It's just required that
> "./configure ; make ; make clean ; ./configure ; make" works. It is
> possible that the first build modifies some files, but that the p
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:50:52AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
> >> row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
> >> doing a complicated dance to
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This check would fail many packages that can still be built twice in a
>> row (any package that runs autotools during the build process without
>> doing a complicated dance to preserve the upstream-shipp
Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gerard Lledó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
>> be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least, using
>> debuild). So directory should look like a fresh $ apt-get so
On 29/06/07 at 20:21 +0300, Gerard Lledó wrote:
> On 6/29/07, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> >
> >> * Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
> >> > I don't know how much typical this example is, but the two "can't build
> >> > twice
On 6/29/07, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
> > I don't know how much typical this example is, but the two "can't build
> > twice in a row" bugs I got were like that.
>
> The you should/could
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
> > I don't know how much typical this example is, but the two "can't build
> > twice in a row" bugs I got were like that.
>
> The you should/could remove the .mo files in your debian/rules clean
> targ
* Santiago Vila [Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:13 +0200]:
> Consider the case where the .diff.gz for a package updates a .po file but
> not the corresponding .mo file (which are usually included in the original
> tarball as well).
> You need to run ./configure at least to be able to run the clean target
Gerard Lledó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
> be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least, using
> debuild). So directory should look like a fresh $ apt-get source
> packagename. And the contents of the file
Hi,
> I've been looking for FTBFS bugs in the BTS and I've noticed that
> there are lots of FTBFS if built twice.
>
> My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
> be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at least,
> using debuild). So directory should lo
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Gerard Lledó wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been looking for FTBFS bugs in the BTS and I've noticed that
> there are lots of FTBFS if built twice.
>
> My understanding of debian is far from being complete, but in order to
> be built for a second time a clean is performed before (at l
16 matches
Mail list logo
