Re: Explaining Debian's approach to QA

2018-05-22 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 22-05-18 12:35, Simon McVittie wrote: > We'd have better test > coverage if packages could rely on being able to run tests in a qemu > virtual machine.) Just for the record, it seems possible (albeit somebody needs to do some work) to enable ci.d.n to run VM's: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi

Re: Explaining Debian's approach to QA

2018-05-22 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 20 May 2018 at 19:26:22 +, Jose Miguel Parrella Romero wrote: > Of course, for folks that live in a CI/CD environment where the build > log and the stop light are the vehicles of accountability, the concept > of a piuparts run happening after you've uploaded and getting a bug > report t

Re: Explaining Debian's approach to QA

2018-05-21 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Jose, On 20-05-18 21:26, Jose Miguel Parrella Romero wrote: > Of course, for folks that live in a CI/CD environment where the build > log and the stop light are the vehicles of accountability, the concept > of a piuparts run happening after you've uploaded and getting a bug > report that you th

Re: Explaining Debian's approach to QA

2018-05-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Jose Miguel Parrella Romero writes ("Explaining Debian's approach to QA"): > Over the last few months, I've found myself struggling to find a simple > way to describe our approach to QA to friends and colleagues. I reached > out to lamby a week or so ago and he suggested I brought it to -devel. Th

Re: Explaining Debian's approach to QA

2018-05-20 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Jose Miguel Parrella Romero wrote: > Over the last few months, I've found myself struggling to find a simple > way to describe our approach to QA to friends and colleagues. I reached > out to lamby a week or so ago and he suggested I brought it to -devel. The best