Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:34:46PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
>> > debian version of a package and
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:34:46PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
> > debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
> > binary NMU
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Anthony Towns [Thu, 19 May 2005 15:38:11 +1000]:
>> Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> > As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
>> > field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
>> > the binary package be
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
> debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
> binary NMU and what not is not aparent from the Packages file. It has
> been suggested to
* Anthony Towns [Thu, 19 May 2005 15:38:11 +1000]:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
> > field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
> > the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that make
Anthony Towns writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
>> debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
>> binary NMU and what not is not aparent from the Packages file. It has
>> been suggested to insert Sourc
On 20050519T205101+1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Something equivalent to:
>
> cat /var/lib/dpkg/available |
> awk '/^Package:/ {P=$2;V=""}
> /^Version:/ {if (V=="") { V=$2; } }
> /^Source: .* (.*)/ {V=substr($3,2,length($3)-2)}
> /^Source:/ {P=$2}
> /^$/ {
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
The detection of binary NMUs is currently, among others, using the
debian version of a package and guessing from its form. What is a
binary NMU and what not is not aparent from the Packages file. It has
been suggested to insert Source: entries pointing to the original
so
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described.
Why not add a patch to grep-dctrl instead?
What patch would that be?
Something equivalent to:
Anthony Towns writes:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
>> As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
>> field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
>> the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
>> it a bit harder to m
On 20050519T153811+1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
> > field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
> > the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
> >
Adeodato Simó wrote:
As you probably know, entries in the Packages file only have a Source
field if the name of the source package is different from the name of
the binary package being described. This is an inconsistency that makes
it a bit harder to massage this data, e.g. with grep-dctrl
12 matches
Mail list logo
