Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-28 Thread David Frey
On Fri, Jun 27 1997 16:10 CDT John Goerzen writes: John, I agree with the overall contents of your remarks. Just some remarks: > * HTML cannot do very much with formatting. [...] > * HTML cannot be easily printed. [...] > * HTML cannot be easily grepped. [...] I fully agree. [...] >

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-28 Thread John Goerzen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) writes: > > "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > John> * GNU Info has an awkward interface and is difficult to > John> search. It is also nearly impossible to print an entire > John> manual from the files in the info director

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-28 Thread Federico Di Gregorio
> One questions remains: Is it possible to browse "html.gz" files _without_ > a CGI script with the usual HTML browsers (Netscape, lynx)? If so, we'll > make it policy to gzip all html files and to adopt the references. If not, > we'll have to install all html files gezipped--or add a cgi capable

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-28 Thread Christian Schwarz
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote: > > > "objections" this times. If you can't live with this proposal, you'll have > > to present another formulation of a paragraph or of the whole text. > > > > [ ... ] > > > > /usr/doc//html-info

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-28 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> * GNU Info has an awkward interface and is difficult to John> search. It is also nearly impossible to print an entire John> manual from the files in the info directory. Difficult to search? Did you read its help page at

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-28 Thread John Goerzen
Richard Kaszeta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A good format, but the problem here is that the LinuxDoc/SGML source > isn't very useful by itself, it has to be converted to another source > to be useful. I don't see a big problem with that because, as I said, the conversion programs are small and

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-27 Thread Richard Kaszeta
>I would suggest either of the following: > * DVI format. It can be converted to HTML (I think...) and plain > text on-the-fly. The conversions of DVI->HTML and DVI->Text produce results that range from poor to completely unusable. > * LinuxDoc/SGML. This is probably the best choice. It co

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-27 Thread John Goerzen
Whoa! I kinda had noticed that some packages were going to HTML, but with a new job and a pending move, I haven't been reading these lists as closely as I probably should. There are several VERY SERIOUS problems with making everything HTML: * HTML cannot do very much with formatting. When a pr

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-27 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Christian Schwarz wrote: > "objections" this times. If you can't live with this proposal, you'll have > to present another formulation of a paragraph or of the whole text. > > [ ... ] > > /usr/doc//html-info/ Would not texi-html or

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-27 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Christian" == Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Christian> One questions remains: Is it possible to browse Christian> "html.gz" files _without_ a CGI script with the usual Christian> HTML browsers (Netscape, lynx)? I used to be able to read gzipped html files with N

Re: End of Documentation Discussion

1997-06-27 Thread Michael Barabanov
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: >> "Christian" == Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Christian> One questions remains: Is it possible to browse >Christian> "html.gz" files _without_ a CGI script with the usual >Christian> HTML browsers (Netscape