Hi Martin,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:18:33PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 13:10]:
> > | I have yet to see a proposal how to do multiarch in the right way.
> > What is lacking in the proposals out there?
> The following is what I (as DPL) sent
Hi,
just writing this from the top of my had to be used by anyone writing
this up nicely later.
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 13:10]:
>> | I have yet to see a proposal how to do multiarch in the right way.
>> What is lacking in t
* Martin Michlmayr
| Basically, there has been a lot of discussions about multi-arch and
| some people seem to think that after sarge we'll _obviously_ move to
| multi-arch. Well, this is not so obvious to me. In particular, I see
| no consensus among ftpmaster/archive people, release people, t
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:18:33PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 13:10]:
> > | I have yet to see a proposal how to do multiarch in the right way.
> > What is lacking in the proposals out there?
>
> The following is what I (as DPL) sent to the re
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[snip]
> - a _clear_ plan about this migration (and have this plan before
> sarge is out), including a clear timeplan (announcement on day X,
> maintainers have Y months to upload, if they don't do it in Y
> months, we'll have a time of Z people who'll NMU the
5 matches
Mail list logo
