Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, that's not *necessairly* true. If the buildd maintainer is also
> part of DSA/ftpmasters (as seems to often be the case, and might even be
> required by some unwritten law) then it'd be possible for them to
> disable the account doing the uploadin
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Another architecure that isn't keeping up to the 98% mark has a buildd
> > mainainter who insists (to the point of threating) that I don't build
> > and upload packages to help the build with its backlo
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Another architecure that isn't keeping up to the 98% mark has a buildd
> mainainter who insists (to the point of threating) that I don't build
> and upload packages to help the build with its backlog and lack of
> requeueing.
So? A buildd maintainer do
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Why don't you start building packages yourselves? You do have access
>to the hardware, right? It's supposed to be blindingly fast, right?
Another architecure that isn't keeping up to the 98% mark
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:17:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > > Yes, it was a broken autobuilder, the only autobuilder, the others are
> > > blocked by the w-b admins.
> > Why don't you start building packages yourselves? You do have access
>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:17:23AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > Yes, it was a broken autobuilder, the only autobuilder, the others are
> > blocked by the w-b admins.
> Why don't you start building packages yourselves? You do have access
> to the hardware, right? It's supposed to be blind
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:12:51PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > Looking at the stats[1], the amount of compiled packages seems to be a
> > blocker: 250-300 need-build packages. At approximatly 9000 source packages,
> > around 8820 must be built to s
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:12:51PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> Looking at the stats[1], the amount of compiled packages seems to be a
> blocker: 250-300 need-build packages. At approximatly 9000 source packages,
> around 8820 must be built to satisfy the 98% barrier. Looking at longer
> timefr
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 12:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> >(exactly because of arches like s390 who
> > should be able to reach tier-1 easily, but really have no reason to be on
> > the mirror network).
>
> But it does *not* say that s390 is likely to be among the released
> architectures. And I do no
David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Elsewhere I believe Steve mentioned, that earlier versions had tier-1 ==
> ftp.d.o, but that this was dropped
Yes, although it requires thorough reading, this is what the Vancouver
proposal seems to say.
>(exactly because of arches like s390 who
> sho
10 matches
Mail list logo
