On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 06:41:25PM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> >
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 07:56:31PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hello Fabien!
Hello Marcus!
>
> On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand you well but here is my opinions about freeness
> > of Documentation:
> >
> > Documentation descri
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > Documentation may be include
Hello Fabien!
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand you well but here is my opinions about freeness
> of Documentation:
>
> Documentation describing the functionnality of a software are dependant
> of the software. Then, they should be consid
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:22:33AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > on the unmodified use of the documentation
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > >
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (including the Linux/m68k FAQ, which isn't in Debian because it's
> not DFSG-free and I have no intention of making it DFSG-free),
Great Chris, but what happens if, God forbid, you (and Jörg) were to
be run over by a bus tomorrow? Your FAQ becomes wor
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dunno. But a lot of people have a copyright restriction in the document to
> make sure that the actual integrity of the standard remains intact (see, for
> example, the W3C's standards for HTTP and HTML).
This need is met by a "label is sacred" sort of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > on the unmodified use of the
On Jun 08, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I can't imagine why people are afraid that other people will change the
> standards. Why should anybody try to apply essential changes to, for
> example, the FSSTND?
Dunno. But a lot of people have a copyright restriction in the document to
make sure that the
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> on the unmodified use of the documentation and no restrictions on
> translating the documentation to another format, pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Santiago Vila Doncel, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 2 21:45:40 1998
>Date: 28 May 1998 22:02:52 -0400
>
>Once upon a time, I thought I would learn Perl. I got a copy of a
>free manual, but I found it simply unre
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [RMS article omitted because it may only be distributed "verbatim"; my
> quoting would violate his copyright]
No, fair use allows quotes.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> This could be more than what is really needed.
>
> I think we should just add a paragraph to the DFSG saying that although
> the DFSG applies to *software*, modifying the documentation for such
> software should be also allowed, in general, because otherwise the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I think:
>
> * We should treat documentation under the same terms as software, as we need
> it to use the software successfully and we'll have the same benefits of free
> documentation as we have of free software.
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 11:54:26AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> --On Fri, Jun 5, 1998 3:26 pm +0200 "Marcus Brinkmann"
>
> > [Marcus asked:]
> > It seems to imply, that I'm not allowed to derive a new license, using
> > portions of the GPL (even when changing the name). Is that correct?
>
--On Fri, Jun 5, 1998 3:26 pm +0200 "Marcus Brinkmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
>
> I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
> Debian should include all licenses in whole, and
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
>
> I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
> Debian should include all licenses in whole, and the dfsg should not exactly
> apply to
18 matches
Mail list logo
