On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:42:57PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Something like nullmailer or ssmtp.
Sadly, both of those are pretty crappy.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 05:42:57 pm Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
> >
> > Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
> > applications.
>
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> Oh ok thank you, that explains why it didn't work here even with
> deleting the config files, there is an MTA configured.
Uh... it asks you the questions even if there is an MTA configured.
Don Armstrong
--
Identical parts aren't.
-- Beach's Law
http:
Hi Don,
* Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:42]:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> > The question was if you get asked how to report bugs on install this
> > should have nothing to do with what the user has in his home
> > directory.
>
> Of course it should; reportbug needs
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> The question was if you get asked how to report bugs on install this
> should have nothing to do with what the user has in his home
> directory.
Of course it should; reportbug needs to know who is sending the mail,
and the proper place to store that is in t
Hi Stephen,
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:35]:
> This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> > Hi Daniel,
> > * Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:25]:
> > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > > Just tried by doing an aptitude
This one time, at band camp, Nico Golde said:
> Hi Daniel,
> * Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:25]:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug && aptitude
> > > install reportbug since I haven't install
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 20:25]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug && aptitude
> > install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh system
> > for quite some time, but it didn'
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:00:20PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Just tried by doing an aptitude purge reportbug && aptitude
> install reportbug since I haven't installed a fresh system
> for quite some time, but it didn't ask at least on this
> system here.
I would imagine it's in $HOME/.reportbu
Hi Bernd,
* Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 19:49]:
> >> reportbug is able to talk smtp to bugs.d.o directly, reportbug-ng allows
> >> the user to select a MUA to edit and send the mail.
> >
> > Yes that's true however the default configuration should be
> > changed then.
>
> Doesn
>> reportbug is able to talk smtp to bugs.d.o directly, reportbug-ng allows
>> the user to select a MUA to edit and send the mail.
>
> Yes that's true however the default configuration should be
> changed then.
Doesn't reportbug just ask how to submit bugs while starting it the
first time? IMHO
On 24-Oct-07, 11:52 (CDT), martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.24.1742 +0200]:
> > No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> > maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
>
Hi Bernd,
* Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 19:04]:
> >> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> >> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
> >> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
> >
Nico Golde schrieb:
> Hi Joerg,
> * Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 17:44]:
>> On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>
Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
>>> Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
>>> applications.
>> No. if we ever switch away
Hi,
>> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
>> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
>> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
>> just does local delivery.
> [...]
> Wouldn't this make it more di
* Joerg Jaspert [Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:42:57 +0200]:
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
> just does local delivery
also sprach Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.24.1742 +0200]:
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
> maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only good option is
> to use a package that does not listen on any interface by default and
> just
Hi Joerg,
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 17:44]:
> On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> >> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
> > Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
> > applications.
>
> No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we sho
On 11182 March 1977, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
> Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
> applications.
No. if we ever switch away from exim, which we should, (a move the exim
maintainer sure would love :), less bugreports), the only
On Oct 24, Soren Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thoughts? Flames? Let me have it! :)
Let's just switch to postfix, exim is way too much complex for most
applications.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
